public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 01/16] Blackfin: BF60x: new processor port
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 00:39:53 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201208080039.54568.vapier@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1344326875-348-1-git-send-email-lliubbo@gmail.com>

On Tuesday 07 August 2012 04:07:40 Bob Liu wrote:
> From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
> 
> Add basic support for blackfin new processor BF60x.

i had always intended to clean & split this 1 change up, but never got a 
chance before i left

>  arch/blackfin/cpu/cpu.c                            |    4 +-
>  arch/blackfin/cpu/gpio.c                           |   36 +-
>  arch/blackfin/cpu/initcode.c                       |   53 +-
>  arch/blackfin/cpu/reset.c                          |    2 +
>  arch/blackfin/cpu/serial.c                         |   65 +-
>  arch/blackfin/cpu/serial.h                         |  222 +-
>  arch/blackfin/cpu/serial1.h                        |  236 ++
>  arch/blackfin/cpu/serial4.h                        |  113 +
>  arch/blackfin/include/asm/blackfin_cdef.h          |    3 +
>  arch/blackfin/include/asm/blackfin_def.h           |    5 +
>  arch/blackfin/include/asm/blackfin_local.h         |    2 +
>  arch/blackfin/include/asm/dma.h                    |  113 +-
>  arch/blackfin/include/asm/gpio.h                   |    2 +-
>  arch/blackfin/include/asm/mach-bf609/BF609_cdef.h  |  540 +++
>  arch/blackfin/include/asm/mach-bf609/BF609_def.h   | 3752
>  arch/blackfin/include/asm/mach-bf609/anomaly.h     | 
>  arch/blackfin/include/asm/mach-bf609/def_local.h   |    5 +
>  arch/blackfin/include/asm/mach-bf609/gpio.h        |  151 +
>  arch/blackfin/include/asm/mach-bf609/portmux.h     |  251 ++
>  arch/blackfin/include/asm/mach-bf609/ports.h       |   63 +
>  arch/blackfin/include/asm/mach-common/bits/cgu.h   |   78 +
>  arch/blackfin/include/asm/mach-common/bits/dde.h   |   88 +
>  arch/blackfin/include/asm/mach-common/bits/dma.h   |    1 +
>  arch/blackfin/include/asm/mach-common/bits/pll.h   |    5 +
>  arch/blackfin/include/asm/mach-common/bits/uart4.h |   66 +
>  arch/blackfin/lib/board.c                          |    2 +-
>  arch/blackfin/lib/clocks.c                         |  128 +-
>  arch/blackfin/lib/string.c                         |   97 +-
>  include/configs/bfin_adi_common.h                  |    2 +

i would split this into at least 5 pieces:
 - gpio changes
 - dma changes
 - serial changes
 - new headers (asm/mach-bf609/* and the blackfin_{cdef,def,local} changes 
which include those)
 - core changes (cpu/reset/board/etc...)

once that's been split up, it'll be much easier to digest/review.  some 
changes i won't mind merging now, but others (see below) will clearly need 
updating first

> --- a/arch/blackfin/cpu/initcode.c
> +++ b/arch/blackfin/cpu/initcode.c
> @@ -16,17 +16,21 @@
>  #include <asm/mach-common/bits/bootrom.h>
>  #include <asm/mach-common/bits/core.h>
>  #include <asm/mach-common/bits/ebiu.h>
> -#include <asm/mach-common/bits/pll.h>
> -#include <asm/mach-common/bits/uart.h>
> +
> +#define BUG() while (1) { asm volatile("emuexcpt;"); }
> 
>  #define BUG() while (1) { asm volatile("emuexcpt;"); }

looks like you got a rebase error here

> +#if 0
> +
> +#include <asm/mach-common/bits/pll.h>

well that'll obviously need updating :)

> +#else
> +
> +#include <asm/mach-common/bits/cgu.h>
> +
> +#ifndef CONFIG_CGU_CTL_VAL
> +# define CONFIG_CGU_CTL_VAL ((CONFIG_VCO_MULT << 8) | CONFIG_CLKIN_HALF)
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifndef CONFIG_CGU_DIV_VAL
> +# define CONFIG_CGU_DIV_VAL \
> +	((CONFIG_CCLK_DIV   << CSEL_P)   | \
> +	 (CONFIG_SCLK0_DIV  << S0SEL_P)  | \
> +	 (CONFIG_SYSCLK_DIV << SYSSEL_P) | \
> +	 (CONFIG_SCLK1_DIV  << S1SEL_P)  | \
> +	 (CONFIG_DCLK_DIV   << DSEL_P)   | \
> +	 (CONFIG_OCLK_DIV   << OSEL_P))
> +#endif
> +
> +BOOTROM_CALLED_FUNC_ATTR
> +void initcode(ADI_BOOT_DATA *bs)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +#endif

there was no bootrom when i did the initial port.  i'd like to think that 
there's a bootrom now that you guys have actual silicon back.  is that not the 
case ?  this will def need implementing, otherwise how can you boot a bf60x 
cpu ?

> --- a/arch/blackfin/lib/board.c
> +++ b/arch/blackfin/lib/board.c
>
>  		"(Detected Rev: 0.%d) "
>  		"(%s boot)\n",
>  		gd->bd->bi_cpu,
> -		bfin_revid(),
> +		/*bfin_revid()*/0,
>  		get_bfin_boot_mode(CONFIG_BFIN_BOOT_MODE));
>  	return 0;
>  }

that needs implementing :)

> --- a/include/configs/bfin_adi_common.h
> +++ b/include/configs/bfin_adi_common.h

>  #ifndef CONFIG_DEBUG_EARLY_SERIAL
> +#ifndef __ADSPBF60x__
>  # define CONFIG_SERIAL_MULTI
>  # define CONFIG_SYS_BFIN_UART
>  #endif
> +#endif

i don't recall if i turned this off as an optimization for early work, or 
because it was unimplemented.  i think the former, but if it's the latter, 
it'll need implementing and this ifdef thrown away.
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20120808/fb561e01/attachment.pgp>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-08-08  4:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-07  8:07 [U-Boot] [PATCH 01/16] Blackfin: BF60x: new processor port Bob Liu
2012-08-07  8:07 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 02/16] Blackfin: bf609-ezkit: new board port Bob Liu
2012-08-08  4:41   ` Mike Frysinger
2012-08-20  7:55     ` Bob Liu
2012-08-07  8:07 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 03/16] Blackfin: Bf60x: support big cplb page Bob Liu
2012-08-08  4:48   ` Mike Frysinger
2012-08-20  8:00     ` Bob Liu
2012-08-23  3:49       ` Mike Frysinger
2012-08-07  8:07 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 04/16] Blackfin: Rsi: add support for bf609-ezkit Bob Liu
2012-08-08  4:52   ` Mike Frysinger
2012-08-20  8:01     ` Bob Liu
2012-08-07  8:07 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 05/16] Blackfin: Paraflash: " Bob Liu
2012-08-08  4:55   ` Mike Frysinger
2012-08-20  8:01     ` Bob Liu
2012-08-07  8:07 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 06/16] Blackfin: Bf609-ezkit: implement soft switch Bob Liu
2012-08-08  4:59   ` Mike Frysinger
2012-08-20  8:11     ` Bob Liu
2012-08-23  3:53       ` Mike Frysinger
2012-08-07  8:07 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 07/16] Blackfin: Spi: add bf6xx spi driver Bob Liu
2012-08-08  5:02   ` Mike Frysinger
2012-08-20  8:11     ` Bob Liu
2012-08-07  8:07 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 08/16] Blackfin: add more print info for Bf60x Bob Liu
2012-08-08  5:04   ` Mike Frysinger
2012-08-20  8:12     ` Bob Liu
2012-08-07  8:07 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 09/16] Blackfin: Bf60x: add reset support Bob Liu
2012-08-08  5:05   ` Mike Frysinger
2012-08-20  8:13     ` Bob Liu
2012-08-07  8:07 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 10/16] Blackfin: Bf60x: Check card ready for each RSI command Bob Liu
2012-08-08  5:05   ` Mike Frysinger
2012-08-20  8:13     ` Bob Liu
2012-08-07  8:07 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 11/16] Blackfin: Bf60x: support clock init Bob Liu
2012-08-08  5:06   ` Mike Frysinger
2012-08-07  8:07 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 12/16] Blackfin: Bf60x: initcode: set up uart baud properly Bob Liu
2012-08-08  5:06   ` Mike Frysinger
2012-08-07  8:07 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 13/16] Blackfin: Bf60x: add hw watchdog support Bob Liu
2012-08-08  5:11   ` Mike Frysinger
2012-08-20  8:25     ` Bob Liu
2012-08-07  8:07 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 14/16] Blackfin: setup SMC if user desires it Bob Liu
2012-08-07  8:07 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 15/16] Blackfin: Bf60x: add resume from hibernate Bob Liu
2012-08-07  8:07 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 16/16] Blackfin: update license to Clear BSD license Bob Liu
2012-08-08  5:12   ` Mike Frysinger
2012-08-20  8:25     ` Bob Liu
2012-08-08  4:39 ` Mike Frysinger [this message]
2012-08-20  7:54   ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 01/16] Blackfin: BF60x: new processor port Bob Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201208080039.54568.vapier@gentoo.org \
    --to=vapier@gentoo.org \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox