public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] Early malloc() summary
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 16:52:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201208161652.01179.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <502CD8B3.4070104@gmail.com>

Dear Graeme Russ,

> Hi Marek,
> 
> On 08/15/2012 12:00 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Dear Graeme Russ,
> > 
> >> Hi Marek,
> >> 
> >> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
> >>> Dear Tomas Hlavacek,
> >>> 
> >>>> Hello Marek,
> >>>> 
> >>>> On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 1:16 AM, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
> >>>>> So ... we should aim for firing up the real mallocator as soon as
> >>>>> possible and maybe implement discontigmem (sparsemem) into it, so we
> >>>>> don't have to bother with relocating pointers maybe?
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> The only problem I see is platforms where the memory disappears.
> >>>> 
> >>>> I doubt that on ARM for instance you can set off real mallocator that
> >>>> early without completely rewriting it.
> >>> 
> >>> Esp. on ARM, I won't see much of a problem. You usually have some small
> >>> SRAM where such allocator could run.
> >>> 
> >>>> The idea of having one complex
> >>>> mallocator working in the same manner in board_init_f and board_init_r
> >>>> stages, being able to operate on all platforms using their nifty
> >>>> memory-management/model features
> >>> 
> >>> Do you need them? You usually need only a piece of RW memory.
> >>> 
> >>>> and being seamless to users is really
> >>>> tempting. But do we need/want to introduce such deep rewrites?
> >>> 
> >>> Deep rewrites? You'd only need to implement sparsemem into it, which
> >>> might be list of RW memory areas instead of one memory area.
> >> 
> >> OK, stop right there (please) - This gets into a highly architecturally
> >> specific implementations of malloc. Let's not go there OK :)
> > 
> > Not really, today you give the mallocator one slab of memory on which it
> > operates ... making it so it'd operate on a list of such slabs shouldn't
> > be _that_ hard.
> 
> When you start throwing around "discontigmem", "sparsemem" and "nifty
> memory-management/model features" you are talking architecture specifics

In uboot, not so much ... in uboot it'd be just a matter of making one memory 
are that's currently available to malloc() into list of memory areas and that's 
all. Not specific at all


Best regards,
Marek Vasut

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-16 14:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-09  0:55 [U-Boot] Early malloc() summary Graeme Russ
2012-08-09 12:48 ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-08-11 23:16   ` Marek Vasut
2012-08-14  8:11     ` Tomas Hlavacek
2012-08-14 12:37       ` Marek Vasut
2012-08-14 13:08         ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-08-14 14:40           ` Marek Vasut
2012-08-14 13:54         ` Graeme Russ
2012-08-14 14:00           ` Marek Vasut
2012-08-16 11:25             ` Graeme Russ
2012-08-16 14:52               ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2012-08-16 23:05                 ` Graeme Russ
2012-08-14 23:56           ` Marek Vasut
2012-08-16 11:39             ` Graeme Russ
2012-08-15 12:00           ` Tomas Hlavacek
2012-08-16 11:56             ` Graeme Russ
2012-08-16 14:50               ` Marek Vasut
2012-08-16 23:03                 ` Graeme Russ
2012-08-16 23:32                   ` Marek Vasut
2012-08-16 23:50                     ` Graeme Russ
2012-08-17  0:34                       ` Marek Vasut
2012-08-17  1:15                         ` Graeme Russ
2012-08-19 13:21                           ` Tomas Hlavacek
2012-08-19 23:47                             ` Graeme Russ

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201208161652.01179.marex@denx.de \
    --to=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox