From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Allen Martin Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 13:54:07 -0700 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] MAKEALL: fix ARM board lists In-Reply-To: <20120829201339.GF9587@nvidia.com> References: <1346267590-22256-1-git-send-email-amartin@nvidia.com> <503E759C.7060009@ti.com> <20120829201339.GF9587@nvidia.com> Message-ID: <20120829205407.GG9587@nvidia.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 01:13:39PM -0700, Allen Martin wrote: > On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 01:03:40PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > > On 08/29/2012 12:13 PM, Allen Martin wrote: > > > The LIST_arm rule included the Atmel boards twice (by virtue of > > > including both LIST_at91 and LIST_ARM9) and was missing all the > > > arm720t, arm946es, and arm1176 boards. Change this list to use > > > boards_by_arch() which is less error prone. After this change > > > "./MAKEALL arm" and "./MAKEALL -a arm" build the same boards. > > > > > > Also add the missing arm946es and arm1176 processors to the ARM9 > > > and ARM11 lists respectively and add an ARM7 list for the arm720t > > > processor. > > > > Good find! Would you mind looking quickly over the other arches to see > > if they have any similar but now obvious problems (where LIST_${ARCH} > > doesn't use boards_by_arch)) ? Thanks! > > > > -- > > Tom > > By experiment it look like m68k and mips have problems too, I'll investigate: > It looks like mips splits out the little endian boards into a virtual "mips_el" architecture that doesn't actually exist in boardfs.cfg, so maybe I won't touch that. I founds some other missing/duplicate boards in mips and m68k though so I'll add those to the patch. -Allen -- nvpublic