From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] usb: remove unnecessary packed attributes
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 22:59:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201208302259.53564.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201208301749.11276.marex@denx.de>
Dear Marek Vasut,
> Dear Lucas Stach,
>
> > We don't actually need to pack those structs, as they
> > are not used to do actual hardware access.
> >
> > This avoids some unaligned accesses and therefore makes
> > the EHCI stack work on ARMv7 without compiler workarounds.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <dev@lynxeye.de>
>
> I need to review this properly, will get back to it soon.
My 7th sense is telling me, these descriptors are sent across the bus.
ehci_submit_root() puts them into buffer and then ehci_submit_async() blasts
them. I believe they must be packed, otherwise the format expected by devices on
the bus won't match and it'll fall apart.
> Until then, CCing other good fellows.
>
> > ---
> >
> > drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c | 2 +-
> > include/usb.h | 2 +-
> > 2 Dateien ge?ndert, 2 Zeilen hinzugef?gt(+), 2 Zeilen entfernt(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c
> > index 18b4bc6..2f4fa5e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c
> > @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ static struct descriptor {
> >
> > struct usb_linux_config_descriptor config;
> > struct usb_linux_interface_descriptor interface;
> > struct usb_endpoint_descriptor endpoint;
> >
> > -} __attribute__ ((packed)) descriptor = {
> > +} descriptor = {
> >
> > {
> >
> > 0x8, /* bDescLength */
> > 0x29, /* bDescriptorType: hub descriptor */
> >
> > diff --git a/include/usb.h b/include/usb.h
> > index ba3d169..63730ee 100644
> > --- a/include/usb.h
> > +++ b/include/usb.h
> > @@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ struct usb_hub_descriptor {
> >
> > unsigned char PortPowerCtrlMask[(USB_MAXCHILDREN+1+7)/8];
> > /* DeviceRemovable and PortPwrCtrlMask want to be variable-length
> >
> > bitmaps that hold max 255 entries. (bit0 is ignored) */
> >
> > -} __attribute__ ((packed));
> > +};
> >
> > struct usb_hub_device {
>
> Best regards,
> Marek Vasut
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-30 20:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-30 15:41 [U-Boot] [PATCH] usb: remove unnecessary packed attributes Lucas Stach
2012-08-30 15:49 ` Marek Vasut
2012-08-30 20:59 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2012-08-30 21:42 ` Lucas Stach
2012-08-30 21:56 ` Marek Vasut
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201208302259.53564.marex@denx.de \
--to=marex@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox