From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] usb: ehci: rework to take advantage of new lowlevel interface
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 23:55:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201208302355.46929.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1346363482.2252.12.camel@tellur>
Dear Lucas Stach,
> Am Donnerstag, den 30.08.2012, 23:09 +0200 schrieb Marek Vasut:
> > Dear Lucas Stach,
> >
> > > Kill off ehci-core.h
> > > It was used to specify some static controller data. To support more
> > > than one controller being active at any time we have to carry the
> > > controller data ourselfes. Change the ehci interface accordingly.
> > >
> > > NOTE: OMAP implemented the ehci stuff a bit backwards and should be
> > > fixed to do the same thing as other platforms. But the change for now
> > > is at least compile clean.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <dev@lynxeye.de>
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > The omap change could be separated out, no?
>
> There is no logic change in OMAP up to now. I just had to add some
> forward decls to make it work, which would not be needed if OMAP worked
> like all the other platforms.
>
> Actually fixing this would be far more invasive and I don't really want
> to do this work, as I don't have a single OMAP board to test with.
CCing Tom
> > Also, I'd fix all these &(*something)->somethingelse if possible.
>
> I just did it this way to minimize the churn this change is causing.
> Removing this, arguably a bit ugly, pointer construct could possibly
> introduce logic errors, that are not catchable by just compile testing
> this. I would rather leave this to someone who actually cares about the
> specific platform.
CC these people please to review such changes.
> > Otherwise,
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
>
> Thanks,
> Lucas
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-30 21:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-30 16:03 [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/4] USB multi controller Lucas Stach
2012-08-30 16:03 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] usb: lowlevel interface change to support multiple controllers Lucas Stach
2012-08-30 21:03 ` Marek Vasut
2012-08-30 16:03 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] usb: ehci: rework to take advantage of new lowlevel interface Lucas Stach
2012-08-30 21:09 ` Marek Vasut
2012-08-30 21:51 ` Lucas Stach
2012-08-30 21:55 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2012-08-30 16:03 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] tegra20: port to new ehci interface Lucas Stach
2012-08-30 16:03 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] usb: add support for multiple usb controllers Lucas Stach
2012-08-30 21:12 ` Marek Vasut
2012-09-04 23:05 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/4] USB multi controller Stephen Warren
2012-09-05 0:30 ` Marek Vasut
2012-09-05 6:21 ` Lucas Stach
2012-09-05 6:30 ` Marek Vasut
2012-09-05 19:11 ` Stephen Warren
2012-09-05 19:27 ` Marek Vasut
2012-09-05 22:13 ` Lucas Stach
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-09-25 22:14 Lucas Stach
2012-09-25 22:14 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] usb: ehci: rework to take advantage of new lowlevel interface Lucas Stach
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201208302355.46929.marex@denx.de \
--to=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox