[U-Boot] pull request for u-boot-tegra/master

[Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>]

Hi Tom,

On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 17:14:09 -0700, Tom Warren <TWarren@nvidia.com>
wrote:

> Seems to be the root Makefile:
> 
> ifeq ($(SOC),tegra20)
> -LIBS += arch/$(ARCH)/cpu/$(SOC)-common/lib$(SOC)-common.o
> +LIBS-y += arch/$(ARCH)/cpu/$(SOC)-common/lib$(SOC)-common.o
> endif
> 
>  fixes it, i.e. ./MAKEALL -s tegra20 w/arm/master branch pullreq-utm
> passes. This change from Daniel Schwierzeck (Makefile: replace LIBS
> by LIBS-y) wasn't in the ARM repo I sync'd to before I sent the pull
> request. I assume it came from ARM/master since then, or maybe from
> u-boot/master.

Thanks for the analysis.

It *could* be a previous attempt of mine at pulling into ARM some
branch where this fix was in and then having to revert to a previous
arm/master due to regressions, and your branch was left based on the
temporary arm/master with the fix.

The only way to avoid this is to strictly follow U-Boot policies for
pull requests: always rebase onto the target branch before sending out
a pull request, i.e. pull requests to u-boot-arm/master should always
be (re)based on u-boot-arm/master, and my ARM pull requests to
u-boot/master should always be (re)based on u-boot/master.

> Looks like we'll need a v11 tegra20 SPL patchset, unless Albert is
> willing to slip-stream this minor fix in.

I'll pick Daniel's commit individually, then locally rebase your branch
with the V10 SPL patch set. If regression builds are ok, I'll send out
the 'applied' for Daniel's patch and your pull req.

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.