[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] arm: Adds board_postclk_init to the init_sequence.

[Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>]

Hi Andreas,

On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 21:17:58 +0200, Andreas Bie?mann
<andreas.devel@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Dear Albert Aribaud,
> 
> On 16.08.12 20:22, Markus Hubig wrote:
> > The board_postclk_init() function can be used to perform operations
> > that requires a working timer early within the U-Boot init_sequence.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Markus Hubig <mhubig@imko.de>
> > Cc: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/lib/board.c |    3 +++
> >  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/board.c b/arch/arm/lib/board.c
> > index f1951e8..109a1ac 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/lib/board.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/lib/board.c
> > @@ -241,6 +241,9 @@ init_fnc_t *init_sequence[] = {
> >  	fdtdec_check_fdt,
> >  #endif
> >  	timer_init,		/* initialize timer */
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_BOARD_POSTCLK_INIT
> > +	board_postclk_init,
> > +#endif
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_FSL_ESDHC
> >  	get_clocks,
> >  #endif
> > 
> 
> how do you think about this suggestion? Will you accept it? Should I
> apply both patches to u-boot-atmel?

From what I see, this converges with what's been in PPC for a long
time... I'm ok with the series going into atmel.

> Best regards
> 
> Andreas Bie?mann

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.