From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/4] USB multi controller
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 21:27:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201209052127.34561.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5047A3E8.7070304@wwwdotorg.org>
Dear Stephen Warren,
> On 09/05/2012 12:30 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Dear Lucas Stach,
> >
> >> Hi Stephen,
> >>
> >> Am Dienstag, den 04.09.2012, 17:05 -0600 schrieb Stephen Warren:
> >>> On 08/30/2012 10:03 AM, Lucas Stach wrote:
> >>>> Hi all,
> >>>>
> >>>> this is a follow up on the patch "USB: EHCI: Initialize multiple
> >>>> USB controllers at once" from Jim Lin. It takes some of the
> >>>> code but has undergone some heavy reworking.
> >>>>
> >>>> When we remove the ifdef horror from the above mentioned patch it's
> >>>> mostly a big interface change to the usb subsystem. As this creates
> >>>> a lot of churn I've split this up into a series. Every patch is self
> >>>> contained so it doesn't break compiles and *should* not regress
> >>>> any functionality on it's own. At least the series is bisectable in
> >>>> case anything goes wrong. I've compile tested all the ARM configs.
> >>>>
> >>>> Both the lowlevel usb and ehci interface change are backward
> >>>> compatible, so implementations that only use one controller can
> >>>> choose to ignore the new interface. All implementations are
> >>>> updated to work with the new function prototypes.
> >>>>
> >>>> For Tegra I've included a patch to actually use the new ehci
> >>>> interface. Patches are based on a Tegra tree with some relevant
> >>>> changes from u-boot-usb picked over, so they should apply to
> >>>> u-boot-usb/master.
> >>>
> >>> Can you explain what this series is based on in a little more detail? I
> >>> tried applying it to Tegra's for-next today, and it wouldn't apply. I
> >>> managed to apply using plain "patch" rather then "git am", but then I
> >>> get a bunch of compile errors:-(
> >>
> >> At the time I wrote those patches the u-boot-usb and u-boot-tegra trees
> >> didn't merge cleanly and I wasted quite some time trying to fix up the
> >> failed merge. In the end I ended up just picking the following over to
> >> my tegra tree, which should be enough to avoid any conflicts with the
> >> usb tree:
> >>
> >> cdeb916120a4 ehci: cosmetic: Define the number of qt_buffers
> >> 44ae0be7461f ehci: Fail for multi-transaction interrupt transfers
> >> 14eb79b7a086 ehci: cosmetic: Define used constants
> >> 5cec214ecd7d ehci-hcd: Boost transfer speed
> >> cffcc5035809 usb_storage: Restore non-EHCI support
> >> 4bee5c83ea46 usb_storage: Remove EHCI constraints
> >> 3e8581bb9589 usb_stor_BBB_transport: Do not delay when not required
> >> db19134615dd ehci: Optimize qTD allocations
> >
> > u-boot-usb master is updated to master and pushed for your enjoyment.
>
> The series doesn't appear to apply to u-boot-usb/master, nor to
> u-boot-tegra/master plus those cherry-picks listed above. Perhaps you
> can rebase on something (although I'm not sure which branch it's meant
> to go through) so I can apply/test it?
I'd say reorder 3/4 and 4/4 (swap them) and then repost the rebased result. I'll
pick it all.
That leads me to a question, why is the tegra usb driver goo still in arch/arm/
and not in drivers/ as it should be?
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-05 19:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-30 16:03 [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/4] USB multi controller Lucas Stach
2012-08-30 16:03 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] usb: lowlevel interface change to support multiple controllers Lucas Stach
2012-08-30 21:03 ` Marek Vasut
2012-08-30 16:03 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] usb: ehci: rework to take advantage of new lowlevel interface Lucas Stach
2012-08-30 21:09 ` Marek Vasut
2012-08-30 21:51 ` Lucas Stach
2012-08-30 21:55 ` Marek Vasut
2012-08-30 16:03 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] tegra20: port to new ehci interface Lucas Stach
2012-08-30 16:03 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] usb: add support for multiple usb controllers Lucas Stach
2012-08-30 21:12 ` Marek Vasut
2012-09-04 23:05 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/4] USB multi controller Stephen Warren
2012-09-05 0:30 ` Marek Vasut
2012-09-05 6:21 ` Lucas Stach
2012-09-05 6:30 ` Marek Vasut
2012-09-05 19:11 ` Stephen Warren
2012-09-05 19:27 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2012-09-05 22:13 ` Lucas Stach
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-09-25 22:14 Lucas Stach
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201209052127.34561.marex@denx.de \
--to=marex@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox