* [U-Boot] Remaining CONFIG_NEEDS_MANUAL_RELOC
@ 2012-09-08 6:36 Marek Vasut
2012-09-08 7:10 ` Andreas Bießmann
2012-09-09 16:16 ` Daniel Schwierzeck
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Marek Vasut @ 2012-09-08 6:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi guys.
I've been pondering if the CONFIG_NEEDS_MANUAL_RELOC is getting away from
MIPS/NDS32/AVR32/Sparc/M68K any soon. We've been having relocation around for a
while, yet these platforms still don't support it. Currently, the MANUAL_RELOC
only bloats code all around and usually breaks things that can be nicely cleaned
up.
So guys, can you please share your roadmaps for this issue?
Thanks in advance for your reply!
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] Remaining CONFIG_NEEDS_MANUAL_RELOC
2012-09-08 6:36 [U-Boot] Remaining CONFIG_NEEDS_MANUAL_RELOC Marek Vasut
@ 2012-09-08 7:10 ` Andreas Bießmann
2012-09-08 7:15 ` Marek Vasut
2012-09-09 16:16 ` Daniel Schwierzeck
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Bießmann @ 2012-09-08 7:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Dear Marek Vasut,
On 08.09.12 08:36, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Hi guys.
>
> I've been pondering if the CONFIG_NEEDS_MANUAL_RELOC is getting away from
> MIPS/NDS32/AVR32/Sparc/M68K any soon.
I started playing around with 'elf relocation' for avr32 beginning this
year when I first saw this dlmalloc relocation warning about aliasing.
But this is not yet finished and disregarded since then.
> We've been having relocation around for a
> while, yet these platforms still don't support it. Currently, the MANUAL_RELOC
> only bloats code all around and usually breaks things that can be nicely cleaned
> up.
I see your point.
> So guys, can you please share your roadmaps for this issue?
I will again look into this later this year. On my roadmap are two major
things.
a) SPL for AT91 to remove the need for AT91bootstrap
b) relocation for AVR32
But sorry, I can not give you a schedule for these features.
Best regards
Andreas Bie?mann
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] Remaining CONFIG_NEEDS_MANUAL_RELOC
2012-09-08 7:10 ` Andreas Bießmann
@ 2012-09-08 7:15 ` Marek Vasut
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Marek Vasut @ 2012-09-08 7:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Dear Andreas Bie?mann,
> Dear Marek Vasut,
>
> On 08.09.12 08:36, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Hi guys.
> >
> > I've been pondering if the CONFIG_NEEDS_MANUAL_RELOC is getting away from
> > MIPS/NDS32/AVR32/Sparc/M68K any soon.
>
> I started playing around with 'elf relocation' for avr32 beginning this
> year when I first saw this dlmalloc relocation warning about aliasing.
> But this is not yet finished and disregarded since then.
Understood.
> > We've been having relocation around for a
> > while, yet these platforms still don't support it. Currently, the
> > MANUAL_RELOC only bloats code all around and usually breaks things that
> > can be nicely cleaned up.
>
> I see your point.
>
> > So guys, can you please share your roadmaps for this issue?
>
> I will again look into this later this year. On my roadmap are two major
> things.
> a) SPL for AT91 to remove the need for AT91bootstrap
> b) relocation for AVR32
>
> But sorry, I can not give you a schedule for these features.
Understood, it'd be cool to have the reloc in place really quick, as I'd be able
to clean up stdio a bit more.
Thanks for your reply Andreas!
> Best regards
>
> Andreas Bie?mann
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] Remaining CONFIG_NEEDS_MANUAL_RELOC
2012-09-08 6:36 [U-Boot] Remaining CONFIG_NEEDS_MANUAL_RELOC Marek Vasut
2012-09-08 7:10 ` Andreas Bießmann
@ 2012-09-09 16:16 ` Daniel Schwierzeck
2012-09-09 16:23 ` Marek Vasut
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Schwierzeck @ 2012-09-09 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi Marek,
2012/9/8 Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>:
> Hi guys.
>
> I've been pondering if the CONFIG_NEEDS_MANUAL_RELOC is getting away from
> MIPS/NDS32/AVR32/Sparc/M68K any soon. We've been having relocation around for a
> while, yet these platforms still don't support it. Currently, the MANUAL_RELOC
> only bloats code all around and usually breaks things that can be nicely cleaned
> up.
>
> So guys, can you please share your roadmaps for this issue?
>
> Thanks in advance for your reply!
I already have it on my todo list for the next months. Unfortunately I
can't give you a schedule.
--
Best regards,
Daniel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] Remaining CONFIG_NEEDS_MANUAL_RELOC
2012-09-09 16:16 ` Daniel Schwierzeck
@ 2012-09-09 16:23 ` Marek Vasut
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Marek Vasut @ 2012-09-09 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Dear Daniel Schwierzeck,
> Hi Marek,
>
> 2012/9/8 Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>:
> > Hi guys.
> >
> > I've been pondering if the CONFIG_NEEDS_MANUAL_RELOC is getting away from
> > MIPS/NDS32/AVR32/Sparc/M68K any soon. We've been having relocation around
> > for a while, yet these platforms still don't support it. Currently, the
> > MANUAL_RELOC only bloats code all around and usually breaks things that
> > can be nicely cleaned up.
> >
> > So guys, can you please share your roadmaps for this issue?
> >
> > Thanks in advance for your reply!
>
> I already have it on my todo list for the next months. Unfortunately I
> can't give you a schedule.
No problem, awesome to know! Thanks!
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-09-09 16:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-09-08 6:36 [U-Boot] Remaining CONFIG_NEEDS_MANUAL_RELOC Marek Vasut
2012-09-08 7:10 ` Andreas Bießmann
2012-09-08 7:15 ` Marek Vasut
2012-09-09 16:16 ` Daniel Schwierzeck
2012-09-09 16:23 ` Marek Vasut
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox