From: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] KernelDoc
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 10:54:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121001085458.850A3202C80@gemini.denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201209270138.12860.marex@denx.de>
Dear Marek Vasut,
In message <201209270138.12860.marex@denx.de> you wrote:
>
> > I think is kind of unfair to expect such efforts for some basicly
> > unrelated changes. If I were in such a situation, I'd feel tempted to
> > throw the towel.
>
> Why would you do so ... you change interface, you document it.
Having to document not only my change, but all the rest of the source
file as well may mean I spend way more work on this doc task than on
the actual fix.
And while I may well understand the area I meddled with, I may not
easily understand the rest of the code, so this is twice hard and time
consuming.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
The language provides a programmer with a set of conceptual tools; if
these are inadequate for the task, they will simply be ignored. For
example, seriously restricting the concept of a pointer simply forces
the programmer to use a vector plus integer arithmetic to implement
structures, pointer, etc. Good design and the absence of errors
cannot be guaranteed by mere language features. - Bjarne Stroustrup,
"The C++ Programming Language"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-01 8:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-25 20:46 [U-Boot] KernelDoc Marek Vasut
2012-09-26 6:50 ` Prabhakar Lad
2012-09-26 7:12 ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-09-26 7:23 ` Prabhakar Lad
2012-09-26 10:07 ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-09-26 7:17 ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-09-26 15:26 ` Marek Vasut
2012-09-26 18:50 ` Joe Hershberger
2012-09-26 19:05 ` Marek Vasut
2012-09-26 19:54 ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-09-26 19:58 ` Marek Vasut
2012-09-26 20:57 ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-09-26 21:31 ` Tom Rini
2012-09-26 23:38 ` Marek Vasut
2012-10-01 8:54 ` Wolfgang Denk [this message]
2012-10-01 9:07 ` Marek Vasut
2012-10-01 10:35 ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-10-01 10:37 ` Marek Vasut
2012-10-09 22:49 ` Tom Rini
2012-10-09 23:35 ` Marek Vasut
2012-10-14 20:26 ` Marek Vasut
2012-09-26 20:00 ` Tom Rini
2012-09-27 6:19 ` Stefan Roese
2012-09-27 17:26 ` Tom Rini
2012-09-27 17:28 ` Fabio Estevam
2012-09-27 23:50 ` Graeme Russ
2012-09-28 0:28 ` Marek Vasut
2012-09-28 0:28 ` Scott Wood
2012-09-28 0:44 ` Marek Vasut
2012-09-26 19:05 ` Tom Rini
2012-09-26 19:10 ` Marek Vasut
2012-09-26 19:46 ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-09-26 19:54 ` Marek Vasut
2012-09-26 20:49 ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-09-26 23:36 ` Marek Vasut
2012-09-26 19:57 ` Tom Rini
2012-09-26 23:39 ` Marek Vasut
2012-09-28 19:48 ` Marek Vasut
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121001085458.850A3202C80@gemini.denx.de \
--to=wd@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox