From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 21:51:55 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 00/32] Add mx6solo/mx6duallite support
In-Reply-To: <506D9EFD.3010305@boundarydevices.com>
References: <1348281558-19520-1-git-send-email-troy.kisky@boundarydevices.com>
	<1349315254-21151-1-git-send-email-troy.kisky@boundarydevices.com>
	<20121004121838.330332d2@lilith>
	<506D9EFD.3010305@boundarydevices.com>
Message-ID: <20121004215155.5210a79e@lilith>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hi Eric,

On Thu, 04 Oct 2012 07:36:45 -0700, Eric Nelson
<eric.nelson@boundarydevices.com> wrote:

> On 10/04/2012 03:18 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> > Hi Troy,
> >
> > On Wed,  3 Oct 2012 18:47:02 -0700, Troy Kisky
> > <troy.kisky@boundarydevices.com>  wrote:
> >
> >> This series goal is to add support for mx6solo and mx6duallite
> >> variants of mx6qsabrelite board. The new targets are
> >> called mx6ssabrelite and mx6dlsabrelite.
> >
> > If the boards are known as 'mx6solo' and 'mx6duallite', they should be
> > named so rather than called yet another nickname.
> >
> 
> Hi Albert,
> 
> I'm not sure I understand your comment.
> 
> mx6solo and mx6duallite are the CPU names, not the
> board names.

That's where the misunderstanding crept in: I thought these were board
names, not CPU names.

> mx6dlsabrelite is a version of the SABRE Lite board containing
> the mx6duallite CPU instead of the mx6quad.
> 
> We'll also be offering Nitrogen6X in mx6solo and mx6duallite
> variants.

Understood now -- and disregard my initial comment.

> Regards,
> 
> 
> Eric

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.