* [U-Boot] [ARM] [STATUS] ATTENTION: Uu-boot-arm/master branch ROLLBACK to 28e5ac2d
@ 2012-10-12 5:53 Albert ARIBAUD
2012-10-12 6:39 ` Minkyu Kang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Albert ARIBAUD @ 2012-10-12 5:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi all,
I am sending this notice because I have force-pushed a rollback of
u-boot-arm/master.
This is due to the recently submitted u-boot-arm/master pull request
being NAKed by Tom: the content of this pull req was exactly that of
the latest u-boot-samsung/master pull req and was a fast forward from
previous u-boot-arm/master (28e5ac2d) which had received extensive
testing from Tom.
Therefore, as a roll back of u-boot-arm/master was both easy to perform
and safe(r) from a release perspective, I decided to stray from formal
master branch management rules and force it back to 28e5ac2d.
All: if you intend to send a pull request to u-boot-arm/master, please
rework this request to take this rollback into account.
Minkyu: for the reasons above, I suggest you roll u-boot-samsung/master
back to 28e5ac2d before building and sending an amended pull req, but of
course the choice is yours.
Amicalement,
--
Albert.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [ARM] [STATUS] ATTENTION: Uu-boot-arm/master branch ROLLBACK to 28e5ac2d
2012-10-12 5:53 [U-Boot] [ARM] [STATUS] ATTENTION: Uu-boot-arm/master branch ROLLBACK to 28e5ac2d Albert ARIBAUD
@ 2012-10-12 6:39 ` Minkyu Kang
2012-10-12 6:45 ` Minkyu Kang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Minkyu Kang @ 2012-10-12 6:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Dear Albert,
On 12 October 2012 14:53, Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am sending this notice because I have force-pushed a rollback of
> u-boot-arm/master.
>
> This is due to the recently submitted u-boot-arm/master pull request
> being NAKed by Tom: the content of this pull req was exactly that of
> the latest u-boot-samsung/master pull req and was a fast forward from
> previous u-boot-arm/master (28e5ac2d) which had received extensive
> testing from Tom.
>
> Therefore, as a roll back of u-boot-arm/master was both easy to perform
> and safe(r) from a release perspective, I decided to stray from formal
> master branch management rules and force it back to 28e5ac2d.
>
> All: if you intend to send a pull request to u-boot-arm/master, please
> rework this request to take this rollback into account.
>
> Minkyu: for the reasons above, I suggest you roll u-boot-samsung/master
> back to 28e5ac2d before building and sending an amended pull req, but of
> course the choice is yours.
>
OK. I'll revert soft i2c patches and send new pull request at next Monday.
Is it OK?
Thanks.
Minkyu Kang.
--
from. prom.
www.promsoft.net
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [ARM] [STATUS] ATTENTION: Uu-boot-arm/master branch ROLLBACK to 28e5ac2d
2012-10-12 6:39 ` Minkyu Kang
@ 2012-10-12 6:45 ` Minkyu Kang
2012-10-12 10:00 ` Albert ARIBAUD
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Minkyu Kang @ 2012-10-12 6:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On 12 October 2012 15:39, Minkyu Kang <promsoft@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Albert,
>
> On 12 October 2012 14:53, Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am sending this notice because I have force-pushed a rollback of
>> u-boot-arm/master.
>>
>> This is due to the recently submitted u-boot-arm/master pull request
>> being NAKed by Tom: the content of this pull req was exactly that of
>> the latest u-boot-samsung/master pull req and was a fast forward from
>> previous u-boot-arm/master (28e5ac2d) which had received extensive
>> testing from Tom.
>>
>> Therefore, as a roll back of u-boot-arm/master was both easy to perform
>> and safe(r) from a release perspective, I decided to stray from formal
>> master branch management rules and force it back to 28e5ac2d.
>>
>> All: if you intend to send a pull request to u-boot-arm/master, please
>> rework this request to take this rollback into account.
>>
>> Minkyu: for the reasons above, I suggest you roll u-boot-samsung/master
>> back to 28e5ac2d before building and sending an amended pull req, but of
>> course the choice is yours.
>>
>
> OK. I'll revert soft i2c patches and send new pull request at next Monday.
sorry. spi, not i2c.
> Is it OK?
--
from. prom.
www.promsoft.net
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [ARM] [STATUS] ATTENTION: Uu-boot-arm/master branch ROLLBACK to 28e5ac2d
2012-10-12 6:45 ` Minkyu Kang
@ 2012-10-12 10:00 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-10-12 14:33 ` Tom Rini
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Albert ARIBAUD @ 2012-10-12 10:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi Minkyu,
On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 15:45:24 +0900, Minkyu Kang <promsoft@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On 12 October 2012 15:39, Minkyu Kang <promsoft@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Dear Albert,
> >
> > On 12 October 2012 14:53, Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I am sending this notice because I have force-pushed a rollback of
> >> u-boot-arm/master.
> >>
> >> This is due to the recently submitted u-boot-arm/master pull request
> >> being NAKed by Tom: the content of this pull req was exactly that of
> >> the latest u-boot-samsung/master pull req and was a fast forward from
> >> previous u-boot-arm/master (28e5ac2d) which had received extensive
> >> testing from Tom.
> >>
> >> Therefore, as a roll back of u-boot-arm/master was both easy to perform
> >> and safe(r) from a release perspective, I decided to stray from formal
> >> master branch management rules and force it back to 28e5ac2d.
> >>
> >> All: if you intend to send a pull request to u-boot-arm/master, please
> >> rework this request to take this rollback into account.
> >>
> >> Minkyu: for the reasons above, I suggest you roll u-boot-samsung/master
> >> back to 28e5ac2d before building and sending an amended pull req, but of
> >> course the choice is yours.
> >>
> >
> > OK. I'll revert soft i2c patches and send new pull request at next Monday.
>
> sorry. spi, not i2c.
>
> > Is it OK?
It's ok, but note that it won't be included in the 2012.10 release
anyway, as monday is the release date.
Amicalement,
--
Albert.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [ARM] [STATUS] ATTENTION: Uu-boot-arm/master branch ROLLBACK to 28e5ac2d
2012-10-12 10:00 ` Albert ARIBAUD
@ 2012-10-12 14:33 ` Tom Rini
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tom Rini @ 2012-10-12 14:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 10/12/12 03:00, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi Minkyu,
>
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 15:45:24 +0900, Minkyu Kang
> <promsoft@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 12 October 2012 15:39, Minkyu Kang <promsoft@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Dear Albert,
>>>
>>> On 12 October 2012 14:53, Albert ARIBAUD
>>> <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I am sending this notice because I have force-pushed a
>>>> rollback of u-boot-arm/master.
>>>>
>>>> This is due to the recently submitted u-boot-arm/master pull
>>>> request being NAKed by Tom: the content of this pull req was
>>>> exactly that of the latest u-boot-samsung/master pull req
>>>> and was a fast forward from previous u-boot-arm/master
>>>> (28e5ac2d) which had received extensive testing from Tom.
>>>>
>>>> Therefore, as a roll back of u-boot-arm/master was both easy
>>>> to perform and safe(r) from a release perspective, I decided
>>>> to stray from formal master branch management rules and
>>>> force it back to 28e5ac2d.
>>>>
>>>> All: if you intend to send a pull request to
>>>> u-boot-arm/master, please rework this request to take this
>>>> rollback into account.
>>>>
>>>> Minkyu: for the reasons above, I suggest you roll
>>>> u-boot-samsung/master back to 28e5ac2d before building and
>>>> sending an amended pull req, but of course the choice is
>>>> yours.
>>>>
>>>
>>> OK. I'll revert soft i2c patches and send new pull request at
>>> next Monday.
>>
>> sorry. spi, not i2c.
>>
>>> Is it OK?
>
> It's ok, but note that it won't be included in the 2012.10 release
> anyway, as monday is the release date.
Indeed. If you want to split out any critical fixes from the spi
patches and get that out today or tomorrow I can build-test things again.
- --
Tom
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/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=2jCx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-10-12 14:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-10-12 5:53 [U-Boot] [ARM] [STATUS] ATTENTION: Uu-boot-arm/master branch ROLLBACK to 28e5ac2d Albert ARIBAUD
2012-10-12 6:39 ` Minkyu Kang
2012-10-12 6:45 ` Minkyu Kang
2012-10-12 10:00 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-10-12 14:33 ` Tom Rini
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox