From: Gabriel Huau <contact@huau-gabriel.fr>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] ARM : Removing unwind dummy functions
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 22:14:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121018201414.GA11821@debian> (raw)
Hi,
I would like to know if it's really necessary to keep the dummy
functions in arch/arm/lib/eabi_compat.c.
These function should not be happen in our case (that why the body is
empty).
They have been introduced due to problems with some toolchains that was
referencing these functions. But we can avoid this hack by adding the
option '-fno-unwind-tables' at the compilation time no ? (correct me if
I'm wrong).
Best regards,
next reply other threads:[~2012-10-18 20:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-18 20:14 Gabriel Huau [this message]
2012-10-18 23:02 ` [U-Boot] Debugging (was: ARM : Removing unwind dummy functions) Albert ARIBAUD
2012-10-18 23:56 ` Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121018201414.GA11821@debian \
--to=contact@huau-gabriel.fr \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox