From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Albert ARIBAUD Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 08:30:42 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] File placement in Soc / board dirs and make issues In-Reply-To: References: <1348281558-19520-1-git-send-email-troy.kisky@boundarydevices.com> <1349315254-21151-1-git-send-email-troy.kisky@boundarydevices.com> <1349315254-21151-18-git-send-email-troy.kisky@boundarydevices.com> <5072D772.5000309@denx.de> <5074D75D.8050200@boundarydevices.com> <5076A94D.9060207@denx.de> <50772D25.3090208@boundarydevices.com> <507747BD.7060103@denx.de> <20121011231502.GC20891@bill-the-cat> <20121013121100.6206ba9e@lilith> <20121014103752.6543a8e8@lilith> Message-ID: <20121023083042.0b201751@lilith> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi Tom, On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 18:24:58 -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Albert ARIBAUD > wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > > > (seems like gmail does not honor the rule that replies should drop the > > "(was: xxxxx)" part in an e-mail subject; but hey, neither does Claws > > apparently. Sigh.) > > > > On Sat, 13 Oct 2012 08:17:41 -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > > > >> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 3:11 AM, Albert ARIBAUD > >> wrote: > >> > Hi Tom, > >> > > >> > On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 16:15:02 -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > >> > > >> >> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:27:09AM +0200, stefano babic wrote: > >> >> > >> >> [snip] > >> >> > One reason to move into the board directory is that there was a decision > >> >> > to move rules related to only one arch or SOC where they belong to, that > >> >> > is in the corresponding arch/ or board/ directory. > >> >> > >> >> I'll admit that maybe my make-fu is off, but that idea doesn't work, at > >> >> least for SPL. So I'd really like someone to make that work first. > >> > > >> > Tom, can you be more specific than 'it doesn't work'? :) > >> > > >> > Seriously, though, I'm interested in understand what the make issue is > >> > there, because I am indeed a proponent of putting files where they > >> > belong to, so if help is needed there, I would try to. > >> > >> I have had no luck moving things like the 'MLO' rule from spl/Makefile > >> to anywhere else. Same with the 'checkthumb' rule in the top-level > >> Makefile. > > > > Ok, now it is more precise :) but still not enough for me to > > efficiently try and analyze the issue. > > > > Let's take the checkthumb rule. Where did you try to move it? > > I tried both arch/arm/config.mk arch/arm/Makefile and couldn't make either work. Thanks. I'm adding this to my todo list, although not as an immediate priority. Amicalement, -- Albert.