From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Rini Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 10:44:33 -0700 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 2/5] arm bootm: Do not append zero ATAG_MEM In-Reply-To: <4096288.bnV9GYCAeK@pali> References: <1327415291-13260-1-git-send-email-pali.rohar@gmail.com> <1350648008-25514-3-git-send-email-pali.rohar@gmail.com> <201210201134.20423.marex@denx.de> <4096288.bnV9GYCAeK@pali> Message-ID: <20121026174433.GD31793@bill-the-cat> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 11:41:51AM +0200, Pali Roh?r wrote: > On Saturday 20 October 2012 11:34:20 Marek Vasut wrote: > > Dear Pali Roh??r, > > > > > If dram bank size is calculated at runtime, it can be zero on > > > some boards. This patch added code which ignore these zero > > > bank size in ATAG_MEM. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Pali Roh??r > > > --- > > > > > > Changes in v4: > > > - No changes > > > > Did we not discuss this patch? > > > > Yes, but there was no change, see: > http://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot at lists.denx.de/msg96706.html I'm sorry if I wasn't clear then. This change should not be needed as N900 should simply always say 1 bank and the correct total memory size of all populated memory banks. Is the problem that in the ATAGs we're re-using we have a zero-size memory ATAG? -- Tom -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: