[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 01/13] mx31: Move EHCI definitions to ehci-fsl.h

[Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>]

Hi Beno?t,

On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 13:37:12 +0100 (CET), Beno?t Th?baudeau
<benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com> wrote:

> Hi Stefano,
> 
> On Saturday, November 10, 2012 8:42:24 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> > On 08/11/2012 21:27, Beno?t Th?baudeau wrote:
> > > The EHCI definitions in i.MX31's imx-regs.h are MXC-generic, so
> > > move them to
> > > ehci-fsl.h so that all MXC SoCs can use them.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Beno?t Th?baudeau <benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com>
> > > Cc: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> > > Cc: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
> > > ---
> > 
> > Hi Beno?t,
> > 
> > > Changes for v2: None.
> > > 
> > >  .../arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx31/imx-regs.h      |   26
> > >  --------------------
> > >  .../include/usb/ehci-fsl.h                         |   22
> > >  +++++++++++++++++
> > >  2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > 
> > By applying this patchset I see several minor issues reported by
> > checkpatch:
> > 
> > WARNING: line over 80 characters
> > #303: FILE: drivers/usb/host/ehci-mx5.c:43:
> > +#define MXC_OTG_UCTRL_OWIE_BIT		(1 << 27)	/* OTG wakeup intr enable
> > */
> > 
> > WARNING: line over 80 characters
> > #305: FILE: drivers/usb/host/ehci-mx5.c:45:
> > +#define MXC_H1_UCTRL_H1UIE_BIT		(1 << 12)	/* Host1 ULPI interrupt
> > enable */
> > 
> > WARNING: line over 80 characters
> > #306: FILE: drivers/usb/host/ehci-mx5.c:46:
> > +#define MXC_H1_UCTRL_H1WIE_BIT		(1 << 11)	/* HOST1 wakeup intr
> > enable */
> > 
> > WARNING: line over 80 characters
> > #312: FILE: drivers/usb/host/ehci-mx5.c:50:
> > +#define MXC_OTG_PHYCTRL_OC_DIS_BIT	(1 << 8)	/* OTG Disable
> > Overcurrent
> > Event */
> > 
> > WARNING: line over 80 characters
> > #313: FILE: drivers/usb/host/ehci-mx5.c:51:
> > +#define MXC_H1_OC_DIS_BIT		(1 << 5)	/* UH1 Disable Overcurrent Event
> > */
> > 
> > WARNING: line over 80 characters
> > #343: FILE: drivers/usb/host/ehci-mx5.c:174:
> > +			v &= ~MXC_H1_UCTRL_H1PM_BIT; /* HOST1 power mask unused */
> > 
> > WARNING: line over 80 characters
> > #352: FILE: drivers/usb/host/ehci-mx5.c:190:
> > +			v &= ~MXC_H2_UCTRL_H2PM_BIT; /* HOST2 power mask unused */
> > 
> > WARNING: line over 80 characters
> > #641: FILE: drivers/usb/host/ehci-mx5.c:47:
> > +#define MXC_OTG_UCTRL_O_PWR_POL_BIT	(1 << 24)	/* OTG power pin
> > polarity */
> > 
> > WARNING: line over 80 characters
> > #645: FILE: drivers/usb/host/ehci-mx5.c:51:
> > +#define MXC_H1_UCTRL_H1_PWR_POL_BIT	(1 << 8)	/* HOST1 power pin
> > polarity */
> > 
> > WARNING: line over 80 characters
> > #648: FILE: drivers/usb/host/ehci-mx5.c:54:
> > +#define MXC_OTG_PHYCTRL_OC_POL_BIT	(1 << 9)	/* OTG Polarity of
> > Overcurrent */
> > 
> > WARNING: line over 80 characters
> > #650: FILE: drivers/usb/host/ehci-mx5.c:56:
> > +#define MXC_H1_OC_POL_BIT		(1 << 6)	/* UH1 Polarity of Overcurrent
> > */
> > 
> > WARNING: line over 80 characters
> > #652: FILE: drivers/usb/host/ehci-mx5.c:58:
> > +#define MXC_OTG_PHYCTRL_PWR_POL_BIT	(1 << 3)	/* OTG Power Pin
> > Polarity */
> > 
> > WARNING: line over 80 characters
> > #873: FILE: drivers/usb/host/ehci-mxc.c:85:
> > +			MX25_H1_OCPOL_BIT | MX25_H1_TLL_BIT | MX25_H1_USBTE_BIT |
> > 
> > WARNING: line over 80 characters
> > #1078: FILE: drivers/usb/host/ehci-mxc.c:184:
> > +			MX35_H1_OCPOL_BIT | MX35_H1_TLL_BIT | MX35_H1_USBTE_BIT |
> > 
> > WARNING: line over 80 characters
> > #1179: FILE: board/freescale/mx35pdk/mx35pdk.c:105:
> > +	mxc_request_iomux(MX35_PIN_USBOTG_PWR, MUX_CONFIG_SION |
> > MUX_CONFIG_FUNC);
> > 
> > WARNING: line over 80 characters
> > #1180: FILE: board/freescale/mx35pdk/mx35pdk.c:106:
> > +	mxc_request_iomux(MX35_PIN_USBOTG_OC, MUX_CONFIG_SION |
> > MUX_CONFIG_FUNC);
> > 
> > total: 0 errors, 16 warnings, 810 lines checked
> > 
> > Can you fix them ? Thanks !
> 
> OK, I'll do that. For the #define-s, do you prefer that I move the comment to
> the previous line, or that I split the end of the comment to the next line?

I'll let Stefano give a definitive answer of course, but I personally
prefer that comments be moved before the defines.

> Best regards,
> Beno?t

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.