public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhi-zhou Zhang <zhizhou.zh@gmail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [Patch 1/2] MIPS: fix a latent bug on initialize $gp
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 23:24:28 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121128152428.GA9056@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACUy__WLhtV2D+ZeyQuv74utGrb8j0pqdZq8Ku2PFFgRtfu46w@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 02:33:10PM +0100, Daniel Schwierzeck wrote:
> 2012/11/26 Zhi-zhou Zhang <zhizhou.zh@gmail.com>:
> > On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 09:30:54PM +0100, Daniel Schwierzeck wrote:
> >> 2012/11/24 Zhi-zhou Zhang <zhizhou.zh@gmail.com>:
> >> > If bal is 8 bytes aligned, the _gp will not be 8 bytes aligned.
> >> > then the following ld insntrustion generates a Adel exception.
> >> > So here make _gp be always aligned in 8 bytes.
> >>
> >> which toolchain do you use? Actually _gp is aligned to 16 bytes in the
> >> linker script.
> >> Thus the instruction "ld gp, 0(ra)" and the address loaded into gp is
> >> always aligned to 8 bytes.
> >> This works at least with ELDK-5.2.1 and a self-built gcc-4.7.2.
> > Thanks for review.
> > I have do a simple test by modify this snip as following:
> > .align 3
> >   //nop
> >   nop
> >   bal     1f
> >   nop
> > .dword  _gp
> > 1:
> >   ld      gp, 0(ra)
> > Qemu give me a Adel exception:
> > (qemu) info registers
> > pc=0xffffffffbfc00688 HI=0x0000000000000000 LO=0x0000000000000000 ds
> > 0098 0000000000000000 0
> > GPR00: r0 0000000000000000 at 000000001000009f v0 0000000000000000 v1
> > 0000000000000000
> > GPR04: a0 0000000000000000 a1 0000000000000000 a2 0000000000000000 a3
> > 0000000000000000
> > GPR08: t0 0000000000000000 t1 0000000000000000 t2 0000000000000000 t3
> > 0000000000000000
> > GPR12: t4 0000000000000002 t5 0000000000000000 t6 0000000000000000 t7
> > 0000000000000000
> > GPR16: s0 0000000000000000 s1 0000000000000000 s2 0000000000000000 s3
> > 0000000000000000
> > GPR20: s4 0000000000000000 s5 0000000000000000 s6 0000000000000000 s7
> > 0000000000000000
> > GPR24: t8 0000000000000000 t9 0000000000000000 k0 0000000000000000 k1
> > 0000000000000000
> > GPR28: gp 0000000000000000 sp 0000000000000000 s8 0000000000000000 ra
> > ffffffffbfc00544
> > CP0 Status  0x10400082 Cause   0x00000410 EPC    0xffffffffbfc00550
> >     Config0 0x80004482 Config1 0xfea3519b LLAddr 0x0000000000000000
> >
> > We can also see the arrange with objdump:
> > ffffffffbfc00538:       00000000        nop
> > ffffffffbfc0053c:       04110004        bal     ffffffffbfc00550
> > ffffffffbfc00540:       00000000        nop
> > ffffffffbfc00544:       00000000        nop
> > ffffffffbfc00548:       bfc36ed0        cache   0x3,28368(s8)
> > ffffffffbfc0054c:       ffffffff        sd      ra,-1(ra)
> > ffffffffbfc00550:       dffc0000        ld      gp,0(ra)
> >
> > It shows that although _gp is aligned to 8 bytes. but it's not in the
> > address of 0(ra).
> 
> I did some experiments too and now I understand your problem. If you put
> additional instructions before "bal 1f", the compiler puts a nop between bal
> and _gp to fill the gap in order to keep _gp aligned. But then the link address
> of bal that will be stored in the gp register points to the additional
> nop and not
> to _gp as it was intended. I can't reproduce this with MIPS32.
> Maybe this is a compiler bug.
Dear Daniel, 
I'm sorry for my poor Engilsh. I didn't describe the problem exactly.
I think tlink script only set the value of _gp. and .dword do decide
where _gp be linked. Because the compiler always align dword to 8
bytes, the gap comes and was filled with zero.
The MIPS's ISA set 4 bytes per instruction. so MIPS's link address
is always aligned to 4 bytes. MIPS32 won't occur this problem. But
if the link address is not aligned to 8 bytes, MIPS64 goes wrong.
We have half chance encountering it.
Thanks.
> 
> I pushed a modified version of your patch to
> git://git.denx.de/u-boot-mips.git [1].
> Could you check if this is okay for you?
> 
> [1] http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-mips.git;a=commitdiff;h=4bb639edce852c8ed2ae3219e436845495270453
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> Daniel

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-28 15:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1353769633-31374-1-git-send-email-zhizhou.zh@gmail.com>
2012-11-24 15:07 ` [U-Boot] [Patch 1/2] MIPS: fix a latent bug on initialize $gp Zhi-zhou Zhang
2012-11-24 15:07 ` [U-Boot] [Patch 2/2] MIPS: do not modify variable before relocate_code Zhi-zhou Zhang
2012-11-25 20:30 ` [U-Boot] [Patch 1/2] MIPS: fix a latent bug on initialize $gp Daniel Schwierzeck
2012-11-26 10:58   ` Zhi-zhou Zhang
2012-11-28 13:33     ` Daniel Schwierzeck
2012-11-28 15:24       ` Zhi-zhou Zhang [this message]
     [not found] ` <1353769633-31374-2-git-send-email-zhizhou.zh@gmail.com>
2012-11-25 20:56   ` [U-Boot] [Patch 2/2] MIPS: do not modify variable before relocate_code Daniel Schwierzeck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121128152428.GA9056@localhost \
    --to=zhizhou.zh@gmail.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox