[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] FAT: remove ifdefs to make the code more readable

[Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>]

Dear Richard Genoud,

> 2012/12/13 Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>:
> > Dear Richard Genoud,
> > 
> >> ifdefs in the code are making it harder to read.
> >> The use of simple if(VFAT_ENABLED) makes no more code and is cleaner.
> >> (the code is discarded by the compiler and linker instead of the
> >> preprocessor.)
> >> 
> >> and bonus, now the code compiles even if CONFIG_SUPPORT_VFAT is not
> >> defined.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >> 
> >>  fs/fat/fat.c       |   55
> >> 
> >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ fs/fat/fat_write.c |
> >> 11 ++-------
> >> 
> >>  2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/fs/fat/fat.c b/fs/fat/fat.c
> >> index 393c378..c79e3e3 100644
> >> --- a/fs/fat/fat.c
> >> +++ b/fs/fat/fat.c
> >> @@ -34,6 +34,12 @@
> >> 
> >>  #include <malloc.h>
> >>  #include <linux/compiler.h>
> >> 
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_SUPPORT_VFAT
> >> +#define VFAT_ENABLED 1
> >> +#else
> >> +#define VFAT_ENABLED 0
> >> +#endif
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> > Make it static const int maybe ?
> 
> I hesitate to make them static const, I can't figure why it's better
> to use static const variable instead of defines.
> Could you enlighten me ?

Because you get the type-checking. Preprocessor is evil ;-)

Best regards,
Marek Vasut