public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ns16550: allow UART address to be set dynamically
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 21:36:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121213203604.1DD9F201213@gemini.denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50CA1BB8.4000704@wwwdotorg.org>

Dear Stephen Warren,

In message <50CA1BB8.4000704@wwwdotorg.org> you wrote:
>
> > Arghh... Do we really, really have to invent yet another way to pass
> > hardware configuration information?  Especially one totally
> > incompatible to any other system?
> 
> This is a special case for the console UART. The idea is to get that up
> and running well before device tree is parsed in any way. For example,
> Tegra's SPL doesn't touch the device tree in any way (or even know one
> exists) but does want to print (possibly error) messages in a generic
> fashion. Similarly, many problems could occur before the device tree is
> parsed (e.g. the user forgets to provide one...), and having
> specifically the console UART set up before that allows those errors to
> be reported, rather than requiring a JTAG or similar debugger.
> 
> My intent is that ODMDATA will definitely only be used for the console
> UART, and will NOT be used for anything else like LCD, RTC, ... Those
> other devices will certainly be configured via device tree.

We've been there before, you know.

OK - what is the scope of visibility of such code?  Will it be
strictly board specific only?  Or SoC specific? Arch? Global?

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
I haven't lost my mind -- it's backed up on tape somewhere.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-13 20:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-12 23:23 [U-Boot] [PATCH] ns16550: allow UART address to be set dynamically Stephen Warren
2012-12-12 23:38 ` Simon Glass
2012-12-12 23:52   ` Stephen Warren
2012-12-13  0:38     ` Simon Glass
2012-12-13 10:29     ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-12-13 18:17       ` Stephen Warren
2012-12-13 20:36         ` Wolfgang Denk [this message]
2012-12-13 20:45           ` Stephen Warren
2012-12-13 20:53             ` Tom Rini
2012-12-13 21:07               ` Stephen Warren
2012-12-13 21:51                 ` Simon Glass
2012-12-14 20:40                   ` Tom Rini
2012-12-14 21:14                     ` Simon Glass
2012-12-14 22:03                       ` Stephen Warren
2012-12-14 22:22                         ` Simon Glass
2012-12-14 22:45                           ` Stephen Warren
2012-12-17 21:09                             ` Tom Rini
2012-12-17 22:24                               ` Stephen Warren
2012-12-17 22:37                                 ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-12-17 22:58                                   ` Stephen Warren
2012-12-18  6:39                                     ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-12-18 16:37                                       ` Stephen Warren
2012-12-18 19:15                                         ` Simon Glass
2012-12-17 21:09                           ` Tom Rini
2012-12-14 22:35                         ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-12-14 21:52                     ` Stephen Warren
2012-12-14 22:31                       ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-12-14 22:26                     ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-12-14 23:16                       ` Graeme Russ
2012-12-15  0:32                         ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-12-15  1:32                           ` Graeme Russ
2012-12-15  7:30                             ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-12-15  9:53                               ` Graeme Russ
2012-12-17 21:04                       ` Tom Rini
2012-12-13 23:11             ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-12-13 23:26               ` Stephen Warren
2012-12-13 10:27 ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-12-13 13:11   ` Tom Rini
2012-12-13 14:22     ` Wolfgang Denk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121213203604.1DD9F201213@gemini.denx.de \
    --to=wd@denx.de \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox