[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/2] arm: move C runtime setup code in crt0.S

[Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>]

Hi Tom,

On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 12:26:07 -0700, Tom Rini <trini@ti.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 01:43:25PM +0100, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> 
> > Move all the C runtime setup code from every start.S
> > in arch/arm into arch/arm/lib/crt0.S. This covers
> > the code sequence from setting up the initial stack
> > to calling into board_init_r().
> > 
> > Also, rewrite the C runtime setup and make functions
> > board_init_*() and relocate_code() behave according to
> > normal C semantics (no jumping across the C stack any
> > more, etc).
> > 
> > Some SPL targets had to be touched because they use
> > start.S explicitly or for some reason; the relevant
> > maintainers and custodians are cc:ed.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
> > ---
> > Changes in v4:
> > - fixed bhs into blo in BSS init loop
> > - switched from explicit literals to '=target' notation
> > - fixed location of GD in initial environment
> > - stopped SPL boot sequence at calling board_init_f
> > 
> > Changes in v3:
> > - various clarifications and typo fixes
> > - fixed wrong LED calls conditional
> > - fixed open comment eating some code
> > - fixed code overrun in SPL case
> > 
> > Changes in v2:
> > - moved description from cover letter to patch commit msg
> > - added note about tests in the cover letter
> > - fixed baords with CONFIG_SPL but not CONFIG_SPL_STACK
> 
> This change breaks sandbox, powerpc, mips and m68k.  I suspect fixing
> sandbox will be the easiest test-case and catch all of the others.
> 
> -- 
> Tom

Ok, then, rolling back ARM and pushing v5 to fix breakage on non-ARM
arches.

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.