From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 14:16:06 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] integrator: pass a Device Tree by default
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdamc_4X-BLobAfN1HTbW7hAwAK2n8-F_QDP3Vrugh=atg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1358642957-12995-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org>
	<201301221304.17153.marex@denx.de>
	<CACRpkdamc_4X-BLobAfN1HTbW7hAwAK2n8-F_QDP3Vrugh=atg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <201301221416.06389.marex@denx.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Dear Linus Walleij,

> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
> >> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 1:53 AM, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
> >> > Shouldn't the load address be 0x8000 instead of 0x800 (it used to be
> >> > 0x7fc0) ?
> >> 
> >> 0x800 works fine, but honestly I don't know why Peter P ages ago chose
> >> the very odd address 0x7fc0.
> >> 
> >> But you know U-boot way better than me, and most things work fine it
> >> seems. What is a typical load address?
> > 
> > Heh, there ain't any "typical load address", the FDT binary is relocated
> > at the end of RAM just before boot anyway, so I'm ok with any address
> > you pick, just make it a sane one ;)
> 
> OK but 0x7fc0 was the load address for the kernel, so I was sort of
> wondering what a "typical" place to load the kernel would be, because
> 0x7fc0 seems quite arbitrarily chosen...

Indeed. I usually stick FDT far past the kernel, but that's just my preference I 
think.

> Yours,
> Linus Walleij

Best regards,
Marek Vasut