From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] U-Boot Bug with newer GCC
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 17:50:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201302021750.38395.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <510D4F16.2030409@denx.de>
Dear Heiko Schocher,
> Hello Jeroen,
>
> On 02.02.2013 16:43, Jeroen Hofstee wrote:
> > Hello Heiko,
> >
> > On 02/02/2013 11:18 AM, Jeroen Hofstee wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> On 02/02/2013 09:37 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> >>> Hello Wolfgang, Sebastian,
> >>>
> >>> On 01.02.2013 12:31, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> >>>> In message
> >>>> <E70AF999396FDF4EAE40E195B847096109F5D3A9@SRVEXCH-2K10.CADCON.INTERN>
> >>>> you
> >>>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>> we are using u-boot in our embedded system with arm-1136jfs cpu.
> >>>>
> >>>> Which exact system / board configuration is this?
> >>>>
> >>>> And which exact U-Boot version (git commit ID ?) is it?
> >>>>
> >>>>> We recently tried a new toolchain with GCC 4.7.2.
> >>>>> If compiled with the new toolchain the feature CONFIG_AUTO_COMPLETE
> >>>>> isn't working.
> >>>>
> >>>> We have been using GCC 4.7.2 for several months now, on many systems.
> >>>> No such problems have been reported before, so I speculate if this is
> >>>> really a problem with mainline code?
> >>>
> >>> Sebastian wrote On 01.02.2013 08:55:
> >>>> we are using u-boot in our embedded system with arm-1136jfs cpu.
> >>>> We recently tried a new toolchain with GCC 4.7.2.
> >>>> If compiled with the new toolchain the feature CONFIG_AUTO_COMPLETE
> >>>> isn't working.
> >>>> U-Boot start normally and on hitting TAB the system freezes.
> >>>> I tracked the problem down the variables __u_boot_cmd_start and
> >>>> __u_boot_cmd_end. Both are not valid with the new toolchain. And
> >>>> accessing one results in a system freeze.
> >>>> Probably the is a problem in arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds. I really bad
> >>>> at linker scripts.
> >>>
> >>> I just see some problems with ll_entry_* functions described in my
> >>> post here:
> >>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2013-February/145711.html
> >>>
> >>> I do not know, if this is the same problem, as I face problems only
> >>> before relocation, after relocation all works fine ...
> >>>
> >>> In this thread Marek wrote, that for this problem albert has
> >>> a solution ... (CCed albert and marek)
> >>>
> >>> Albert? Can you help here?
> >>
> >> I am tempted to think that is unrelated. First of all since you
> >> encounter problems with the 4.6 toolchain. This trap is not present
> >> when
> >> compiling with a 4.6 version (at least not for me).
> >>
> >> Second, because I bothered Marex and Albert already with this
> >> problem on irc and they concluded it could not be ll related.
> >>
> >> Third, because dumping the array of commands to a console,
> >> displays them all correctly.
> >
> > For completeness, the third statement is wrong. It is only the case
> > for the working version, the table has incorrect values for
> > cmdtp->name in current master. So lets hope it is the same problem.
> > I will wait for Albert his patch and check again. Thanks for the pointer.
>
> Thanks for the info!
> In the meantime, I also tried with ELDK-5.3 and see the same
> issue (_u_boot_list_try__start is 0 before relocation).
It must be NULL before reloc. Albert rolled out a patch in [1], please give it a
go. I believe Albert will be sending a followup RFC patch to the ML shortly.
[1] http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-arm.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/fix-
linker-lists
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-02 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-01 7:55 [U-Boot] U-Boot Bug with newer GCC Priebe, Sebastian
2013-02-01 11:31 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-02-01 17:41 ` Jeroen Hofstee
2013-02-01 21:42 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-02-02 11:25 ` Jeroen Hofstee
[not found] ` <E70AF999396FDF4EAE40E195B847096109F5D6FD@SRVEXCH-2K10.CADCON.INTERN>
2013-02-01 21:36 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-02-02 8:37 ` Heiko Schocher
2013-02-02 10:18 ` Jeroen Hofstee
2013-02-02 11:32 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-02-02 14:05 ` Jeroen Hofstee
2013-02-02 15:05 ` Marek Vasut
2013-02-02 21:23 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-02-02 21:22 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-02-02 21:44 ` Jeroen Hofstee
2013-02-04 7:11 ` Priebe, Sebastian
2013-02-04 8:49 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-02-04 11:28 ` Priebe, Sebastian
2013-02-04 11:35 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-02-04 14:23 ` Priebe, Sebastian
2013-02-04 14:32 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-02-04 15:32 ` Priebe, Sebastian
2013-02-04 20:49 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-02-02 15:43 ` Jeroen Hofstee
2013-02-02 17:38 ` Heiko Schocher
2013-02-02 16:50 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2013-02-02 19:12 ` Jeroen Hofstee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201302021750.38395.marex@denx.de \
--to=marex@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox