From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Albert ARIBAUD Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 11:31:57 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC] [PATCH] Avoid R_ARM_ABS32 for bss start and end references -- tester(s) needed for non-ARM architectures also In-Reply-To: <511CA39A.4040200@gmail.com> References: <1360690047-26599-1-git-send-email-albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> <20130214001724-12906@mutt-kz> <20130214091059.5df45b00@lilith> <511CA39A.4040200@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20130214113157.1e2729bb@lilith> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi Andreas, On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 09:43:06 +0100, "Andreas Bie?mann" wrote: > Hi Albert, > > On 02/14/2013 09:10 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > > Hi Luka, > > > > On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 01:17:24 +0100, Luka Perkov > > wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 06:27:27PM +0100, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > >>> This patch SHOULD NOT BE applied in any official U-boot tree! It is > >>> submitted as an RFC and a request to test. > >> > >> I can confirm that this patch applied on top of 9c748e0 worked for my > >> two kirkwood boards. One is in mainline (ib62x0) and one is not. > >> > >> Tested-by: Luka Perkov > > > > Thanks Luka! > > > > Anyone available to test on a non-ARM architecture? I can provide the > > patched linker script if testing on a mainline-supported target. > > I can on AVR32, would you provide the linker script (atstk1002 > preferred, but AFAIR all AVR32 targets use the same linker script)? Yes, there is a single linker script for AVR. Do you have a URL handy for the AVR toolchain you're using? > I think we should apply this change on top of "Refactor linker-generated > arrays", am I right? It uses the same methods as the linker lists one, and eventually it will be part of the series, but it is autonomous -- no need to apply anything else. Thanks for your help! > Best regards > > Andreas Bie?mann Amicalement, -- Albert.