From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 19:47:13 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v7 11/19] arm: relocate_code(): Use
 __image_copy_end for end of relocation
In-Reply-To: <1360961665-10693-11-git-send-email-benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com>
References: <1360961665-10693-1-git-send-email-benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com>
	<1360961665-10693-11-git-send-email-benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com>
Message-ID: <20130216194713.07bb9bd1@lilith>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hi Beno?t,

On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 21:54:17 +0100, Beno?t Th?baudeau
<benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com> wrote:

> Use __image_copy_end instead of __bss_start for the end of the image to
> relocate. This is the same as commit 033ca72, but applied to all ARM start.S.

What is the benefit of this? I find it more logical for BSS-related
code to use a BSS-related symbol than an image-copy related symbol.

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.