From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Albert ARIBAUD Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 17:08:00 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v7 16/19] arm926ejs: Remove deprecated and now unused NAND SPL In-Reply-To: <20130217170454.0d9685cf@lilith> References: <1360961665-10693-1-git-send-email-benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com> <1360961665-10693-16-git-send-email-benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com> <230704286.1528558.1361116297610.JavaMail.root@advansee.com> <20130217170454.0d9685cf@lilith> Message-ID: <20130217170800.2e998a3d@lilith> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi Albert, On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 17:04:54 +0100, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi Beno?t, > > On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:51:37 +0100 (CET), Beno?t Th?baudeau > wrote: > > > Hi Albert, Tom, Zhong, > > > > On Friday, February 15, 2013 9:54:22 PM, Beno?t Th?baudeau wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Beno?t Th?baudeau > > > --- > > > Changes in v7: None > > > Changes in v6: > > > - New patch. > > > > > > Changes in v5: None > > > Changes in v4: None > > > Changes in v3: None > > > Changes in v2: None > > > > > > arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/start.S | 10 ---------- > > > 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-) > > > > I would like to get your feedback regarding the status of the Samsung SMDK6400 > > board: > > - It is not in boards.cfg, so, according to commit 1285a28, support for it > > should already have been removed a long time ago. It also seems to be the > > only board remaining in the main Makefile. > > - It uses the deprecated NAND SPL. > > - MAKEALL does not test its build, which has been broken for a while. > > - If it were removed or fixed, ARM1176's start.S' relocate_code() could be made > > identical to all the other implementations of this function, so all this > > duplicated code could be moved to a common location like crt0.S. Besides > > that, it would be possible to completely get rid of the legacy NAND SPL on > > ARM. > > > > I have no intention of fixing this board, but dropping it and cleaning up ARM > > after that would be easy. > > Cc:ing the board maintainers, as they should be the first ones to be > asked whether they intend to bring the board into boards.cfg and fix > it, or whether it should be dropped. Scratch this: correct maintainer CC:ed now (how about changing the MAINTAINERS file format so that we can tell for sure without having to ceck the first entry?) > > Best regards, > > Beno?t > > Amicalement, Amicalement, -- Albert.