From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Rini Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:06:40 -0500 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] Protect splashimage from improperly aligned addresses In-Reply-To: <1361722763-22953-1-git-send-email-nikita@compulab.co.il> References: <1361722763-22953-1-git-send-email-nikita@compulab.co.il> Message-ID: <20130227200640.GD30746@bill-the-cat> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 06:19:21PM +0200, Nikita Kiryanov wrote: > As discussed in the links below, one needs to be careful about choosing an > address for a splash image BMP file when working on architectures that can't > handle unaligned memory accesses. A bad address may lead to a bricked board, > and the safe addresses are not obvious due to the internal structure of BMP > files. > > This patchset documents the problem and implements an optional callback that > prevents the environment variable from being set to a bad value. > > Finally, it turns this protection on for cm_t35. > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2013-January/144666.html > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2013-February/146021.html > > Nikita Kiryanov (2): > lcd: implement a callback for splashimage > cm_t35: prevent splashimage from being set to a bad value To be clear, this series is the only part required of all of the various ones that have been posted about splash images? Or are others still needed here. Thanks! -- Tom -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: