From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] ARM: mmu: Set domain permissions to client access - build warnings!
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 08:45:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130301084504.6df4b793@lilith> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51302E2D.6090103@ti.com>
Hi Sricharan,
On Fri, 1 Mar 2013 09:57:25 +0530, Sricharan R <r.sricharan@ti.com>
wrote:
> Hi Albert,
>
> On Thursday 28 February 2013 08:35 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 15:20:44 +0100, Albert ARIBAUD
> > <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote:
> >
> >> (sorry for any duplicate of this mail)
> >>
> >> Hi R Sricharan,
> >>
> >> On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 23:38:22 +0530, R Sricharan<r.sricharan@ti.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Currently for ARM based cpu's, mmu pagetable attributes are set with
> >>> manager permissions for all 4GB address space. Because of this the
> >>> 'execute never (XN)' permission is never checked on read sensitive
> >>> regions which results in speculative aborts.
> >>>
> >>> This series changes the domain permissions of the full 4GB space
> >>> to client access for OMAP socs. This avoids all the speculative
> >>> aborts that are currently seen on OMAP5 secure devices.
> >>>
> >>> Tested on OMAP5 SDP (HS) soc.
> >>>
> >>> This series depends on [1] the patch sent by
> >>> <Vincent Stehle<v-stehle@ti.com>
> >>>
> >>> [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot at lists.denx.de/msg102709.html
> >>>
> >>> R Sricharan (2):
> >>> ARM: mmu: Introduce weak dram_bank_setup function
> >>> ARM: mmu: Set domain permissions to client access
> >>>
> >>> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/cache_v7.c | 3 ++
> >>> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/hwinit-common.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>> arch/arm/include/asm/cache.h | 1 +
> >>> arch/arm/include/asm/system.h | 14 ++++++++++
> >>> arch/arm/lib/cache-cp15.c | 13 ++++++++-
> >>> 5 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >> Series applied to u-boot-arm/master, thanks!
> > Correction: I'd wrongly inferred from the testing done on OMAP5 that
> > the series would build fine. However it appears that for targets
> > omap4_sdp4430, omap4_panda and omap5_evm, patch 2/2 has warnings:
> >
> > hwinit-common.c: In function 'dram_bank_mmu_setup':
> > hwinit-common.c:279:3: warning: implicit declaration of function
> > 'set_section_dcache' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> >
> > Luckily, I had not committed to the git repo yet.
> >
> > R Sicharan, can you please check and fix this warning?
> >
> > Amicalement,
> Oh, thats because as i mentioned above, it depends on the below
> patch from vincent .
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot at lists.denx.de/msg102709.html
>
> I did not repost it though. I will do it now for clarity.
Ok -- Vincent's patch was not in my Patchwork TODO and I had read
patches 1/2 and 2/2 in Patchwork, but I had not read the cover
letter thoroughly enough so I had missed the dependency.
(Cc:ing Vincent and Tom)
Vincent's patch series is delegated to Tom and marked "superseded" in
Patchwork but I don't see any later, superseding, series. What
can/should I make of it?
> Regards,
> Sricharan
Amicalement,
--
Albert.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-01 7:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-08 18:08 [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] ARM: mmu: Set domain permissions to client access R Sricharan
2013-01-08 18:08 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] ARM: mmu: Introduce weak dram_bank_setup function R Sricharan
2013-01-08 18:08 ` R Sricharan
2013-01-08 18:08 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] ARM: mmu: Set domain permissions to client access R Sricharan
2013-02-03 14:17 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] " Albert ARIBAUD
2013-02-03 14:19 ` R Sricharan
2013-02-03 14:22 ` R Sricharan
2013-02-03 15:25 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-02-03 16:13 ` R Sricharan
2013-02-28 14:20 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-02-28 15:05 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] ARM: mmu: Set domain permissions to client access - build warnings! Albert ARIBAUD
2013-03-01 4:27 ` Sricharan R
2013-03-01 4:59 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH RESEND] ARM: cache: declare set_section_dcache Sricharan R
2013-03-01 7:45 ` Albert ARIBAUD [this message]
2013-03-01 14:21 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] ARM: mmu: Set domain permissions to client access - build warnings! Tom Rini
2013-03-02 10:08 ` R, Sricharan
2013-03-02 22:46 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-03-04 10:08 ` Vincent Stehlé
2013-03-05 6:04 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH RESEND 0/3] ARM: mmu: Set domain permissions to client access Sricharan R
2013-03-05 6:04 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH RESEND 1/3] ARM: cache: declare set_section_dcache Sricharan R
2013-03-05 6:04 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH RESEND 2/3] ARM: mmu: Introduce weak dram_bank_setup function Sricharan R
2013-03-05 6:04 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH RESEND 3/3] ARM: mmu: Set domain permissions to client access Sricharan R
2013-03-12 4:44 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH RESEND 0/3] " Sricharan R
2013-03-28 8:44 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-03-05 6:39 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] ARM: mmu: Set domain permissions to client access - build warnings! Sricharan R
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130301084504.6df4b793@lilith \
--to=albert.u.boot@aribaud.net \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox