From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Rini Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:28:32 -0400 Subject: [U-Boot] Patches for this merge window In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20130320192832.GP25919@bill-the-cat> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 09:09:29PM -0800, Simon Glass wrote: > [take 2, sorry] > > Hi Tom, > > I see quite a lot of non-x86 patches in my todo list - does that mean > that I should pick them up if I am happy with them, or just assign > them back to you once I've taken a look? > > I'm keen to get the sandbox fs and memory stuff in fairly early if > possible, since I fear breakages and the longer people have to test > the better. No one has screamed about map_sysmem() but I'm not sure if > anyone noticed. So I could pull these in, build and send a pull if > that suits? Perhaps one series at a time.... Also if Mike is having a > break should I pull in the SPI ones assigned to me? > > There is also buildman, and I'm not sure what to do about that. It > would be nice to have some feedback if people have tried it - I have > had a few private emails only. I think it's a great help, but it still > has some rough edges. Looking back at this, I think only buildman is left. Did all of the other patman related changes get submitted cleanly? I think the answer is we'll take in buildman now so it's easier to get folks to try it in their workflows and see where it takes us. -- Tom -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: