[U-Boot] [PATCH v9 18/30] nand: mxc: Switch NAND SPL to generic SPL

[Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>]

Hi Beno?t,

On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 08:30:12 +0200 (CEST), Beno?t Th?baudeau
<benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com> wrote:

> Hi Albert,
> 
> Here is the v10 bundle for those who want to test:
> http://dl.free.fr/vdXBGExyq

Thanks, will build-test it ASAP.

People with ARM (expecially tx25 and mx31pdk) and non-ARM boards please
run-test it too.

> The resulting HEAD is identical to yours, except for
> board/freescale/mx31ads/u-boot.lds in which you had removed the following
> unrelated line for 30/30:
>         __bss_end = .;
> 
> Regarding this line, it is also present in a few other .lds, as well as the
> following ones:
>         KEEP(*(.__bss_start));
>         KEEP(*(__bss_end));
> 
> However, the end section is named .__bss_end in arch/arm/lib/bss.c, so there is
> perhaps something wrong here, unless you did that on purpose because of the
> __bss_end test at the end of the linker script. I had noticed that, but I let
> you handle it. If something needs to be changed here, please do it after my
> series if possible in order to avoid a v11 because of newer rebase conflicts. ;)

Normally, defining __bss_end symbols in the ARM lds files has become 
unnecessary as arch/arm/lib/bss.c now defines then (and in so doing
avoids generating ugly R_ARM_ABS32 relocation records) so yes, the line
removal was intentional, but indeed unrelated to your series.

As for the missing period in the .__bss_end input section specification,
thanks for bringing this to my attention. I'll give it a look at once
as this could lead to tricky bugs popping up...

> I have also noticed that patman is broken in u-boot-arm/master. I don't know if
> this has already been fixed somewhere, but it fails with an internal error while
> running checkpatch, as if an incompatible API change had been made to checkpatch
> recently, and not propagated to patman.

Cc:ing Simon Glass on patman. Note: u-boot-arm/master is pretty close to
u-boot/master at the moment.

> Best regards,
> Beno?t

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.