From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 18:30:58 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [ARM] Rollback *again* -- 5 patches PLUS 31 patches...
In-Reply-To: <20130411172534.22f389bd@lilith>
References: <20130411172534.22f389bd@lilith>
Message-ID: <20130411183058.11bf0186@lilith>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hi Albert,

On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:25:34 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD
<albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> Older toolchain and PPC incompatibilities appeared in the last two
> additions to ToT ARM. To avoid non-bisectability, ToT has been rolled
> back from abbecf4c87 to ae74b65987. This removes
> 
> abbecf4 ARM: Fix __bss_start and __bss_end in linker scripts
> 
> (HIDDEN not known by most binutils 2.22 or older ones)
> 
> aad17a2 ARM: fix CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE semantics
> 72c1601 smdk5250, snow: fix CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE semantics
> 55e46fc da850evm, da850_am18xxevm: fix CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE semantics
> 0502854 cam_enc_4xx: fix CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE semantics
> 
> (PPC builds fail because --pad-to receives an expr, not a constant)

Actually, the failure was not due to this series, but to patch
16/30 of Beno?t's series. In agreement with Tom, rolling further back,
removing the recent TI PR merge and all of Beno?t's series.

Beno?t, can you fix 16/30 wrt PPC building? If you provide branches, I
or Tom can do tests.

Once v12 is ready, I'll apply it back, then the TI PR, then the
__bss_end patch, then the SPL max size series, this one list in order
to give us time to choose how overall SPL text+data+rodata+BSS
size testing should be done.

This still stands:

> Prafulla (and any other impacted ARM tree custodians), be sure to rebase
> as necessary.
> 
> Stephen, that is an occasion to add your proposal to aad17a2.
> 
> Amicalement,

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.