From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Albert ARIBAUD Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 18:48:30 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [ARM] Rollback *again* -- 5 patches PLUS 31 patches... In-Reply-To: <270954750.1682096.1365698015119.JavaMail.root@advansee.com> References: <20130411172534.22f389bd@lilith> <20130411183058.11bf0186@lilith> <270954750.1682096.1365698015119.JavaMail.root@advansee.com> Message-ID: <20130411184830.17372b2e@lilith> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi Beno?t, On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 18:33:35 +0200 (CEST), Beno?t Th?baudeau wrote: > Hi Albert, > > On Thursday, April 11, 2013 6:30:58 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > > Hi Albert, > > > > On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:25:34 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD > > wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > Older toolchain and PPC incompatibilities appeared in the last two > > > additions to ToT ARM. To avoid non-bisectability, ToT has been rolled > > > back from abbecf4c87 to ae74b65987. This removes > > > > > > abbecf4 ARM: Fix __bss_start and __bss_end in linker scripts > > > > > > (HIDDEN not known by most binutils 2.22 or older ones) > > > > > > aad17a2 ARM: fix CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE semantics > > > 72c1601 smdk5250, snow: fix CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE semantics > > > 55e46fc da850evm, da850_am18xxevm: fix CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE semantics > > > 0502854 cam_enc_4xx: fix CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE semantics > > > > > > (PPC builds fail because --pad-to receives an expr, not a constant) > > > > Actually, the failure was not due to this series, but to patch > > 16/30 of Beno?t's series. In agreement with Tom, rolling further back, > > removing the recent TI PR merge and all of Beno?t's series. > > > > Beno?t, can you fix 16/30 wrt PPC building? If you provide branches, I > > or Tom can do tests. > > > > Once v12 is ready, I'll apply it back, then the TI PR, then the > > __bss_end patch, then the SPL max size series, this one list in order > > to give us time to choose how overall SPL text+data+rodata+BSS > > size testing should be done. > > OK, I'll do that. I need to know: > - which board fails, P1021RDB-PC_NAND > - where to find the toolchain binaries ready to use for PPC (Ubuntu package?), Toolchain is ELDK 5.2.1 for powerpc (installs in /opt, need to set PATH=...:/opt/eldk-5.2.1/powerpc/sysroots/i686-eldk-linux/usr/bin/powerpc-linux, ARCH=powerpc, and CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc-linux- > - if all other arches have been build-tested in order to avoid new issues > popping out later. Tom? > Best regards, > Beno?t Amicalement, -- Albert.