From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [ARM] Rollback *again* -- 5 patches
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 20:13:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130411201316.63a629f7@lilith> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+m5__JsTO105AWWJeoTYFhB2iY2z5cxutHN3saxYe4-J2iUyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Tom,
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 11:04:44 -0700, Tom Warren
<twarren.nvidia@gmail.com> wrote:
> Albert,
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Albert ARIBAUD
> <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>wrote:
>
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 10:59:29 -0700, Tom Warren <TWarren@nvidia.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Albert,
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Albert ARIBAUD [mailto:albert.u.boot at aribaud.net]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 9:38 AM
> > > > To: Stephen Warren
> > > > Cc: U-Boot; Prafulla Wadaskar; Tom Rini; Tom Warren
> > > > Subject: Re: [ARM] Rollback *again* -- 5 patches
> > > >
> > > > Hi Stephen,
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:49:45 -0600, Stephen Warren
> > > > <swarren@wwwdotorg.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On 04/11/2013 09:25 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Older toolchain and PPC incompatibilities appeared in the last two
> > > > > > additions to ToT ARM. To avoid non-bisectability, ToT has been
> > > > > > rolled back from abbecf4c87 to ae74b65987. This removes
> > > > > >
> > > > > > abbecf4 ARM: Fix __bss_start and __bss_end in linker scripts
> > > > > ...
> > > > > > Stephen, that is an occasion to add your proposal to aad17a2.
> > > > >
> > > > > Tom Warren as the Tegra maintainer should be taking care of this. I
> > am
> > > > > simply pointing out that the currently proposed changes to the SPL
> > > > > size checking don't fulfil the requirements for Tegra. I don't expect
> > > > > to have to fix the patches.
> > > >
> > > > I did not mean for you to do it, only that there was an opportunity to
> > do it. :)
> > >
> > > Why should I be fixing something I didn't break, and that worked fine
> > before your change?
> >
> > Er...
> >
> > Was "I did not mean for you to do it" unclear?
> >
> Yes, it was unclear.
Apologies, then. I only meant to say that we had time to discuss and
incorporate your solution in the SPL max size patch series since it had
just had to be "unapplied".
> Tom
Amicalement,
--
Albert.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-11 18:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-11 15:25 [U-Boot] [ARM] Rollback *again* -- 5 patches Albert ARIBAUD
2013-04-11 15:49 ` Stephen Warren
2013-04-11 16:37 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-04-11 17:59 ` Tom Warren
2013-04-11 18:01 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-04-11 18:04 ` Tom Warren
2013-04-11 18:13 ` Albert ARIBAUD [this message]
2013-04-12 6:17 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-04-11 16:30 ` [U-Boot] [ARM] Rollback *again* -- 5 patches PLUS 31 patches Albert ARIBAUD
2013-04-11 16:33 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-04-11 16:48 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-04-11 17:03 ` Tom Rini
2013-04-11 16:48 ` Tom Rini
2013-04-12 8:27 ` [U-Boot] [ARM] Rollback *again* -- 5 patches PLUS 31 patches... -- FIXED Albert ARIBAUD
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130411201316.63a629f7@lilith \
--to=albert.u.boot@aribaud.net \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox