From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] crc32: Correct endianness of crc32 result
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 18:39:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130418183929.4ec73ae3@lilith> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130418143909.192F720019A@gemini.denx.de>
Hi Wolfgang,
On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 16:39:09 +0200, Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> wrote:
> > So how about changing the element type of output in the definition of
> > hash_func_ws, adapting the corresponding implementations sha1_csum_wd,
> > sha256_csum_wd and crc32_wd_buf, and adapting the output argument
> > of the sole call to hash_func_ws, that is, the local "u8
> > output[HASH_MAX_DIGEST_SIZE];" in hash.c? Then we'be done with
> > alignment.
>
> OK, but that would be a totally different approach (which appears to
> be a good one, here).
Indeed; I would suggest splitting this change in two independent ones:
- fix the endianness issue: change the endianness of crc through the
use of htonl() but leave the existing memcpy() in place as it is,
even though it is not speed-optimized. That's what Simon's patch
does if the HOSTCC part is ignored;
- fix the unalignment issue by changing parameter 'output' of function
type 'hash_func_ws' from u8* to u32* and adjusting the rest of the
code accordingly -- which would lead to replacing the crc32 final
memcpy() with a single indirect assignment.
These two changes could be submitted either separately, or as a series.
Amicalement,
--
Albert.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-18 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-05 23:11 [U-Boot] [PATCH] crc32: Correct endianness of crc32 result Simon Glass
2013-04-05 23:32 ` Allen Martin
2013-04-06 7:04 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-04-16 21:57 ` Simon Glass
2013-04-16 23:00 ` Tom Rini
2013-04-16 23:16 ` Simon Glass
2013-04-17 5:40 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-04-17 18:28 ` Simon Glass
2013-04-17 19:23 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-04-17 20:59 ` Simon Glass
2013-04-18 6:20 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-04-18 10:36 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-04-18 11:18 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-04-18 14:39 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-04-18 16:39 ` Albert ARIBAUD [this message]
2013-04-18 16:58 ` Tom Rini
2013-04-18 18:43 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-04-18 19:06 ` Simon Glass
2013-04-18 19:18 ` Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130418183929.4ec73ae3@lilith \
--to=albert.u.boot@aribaud.net \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox