From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/6] nand: Add SPL_NAND support to mxc_nand_spl
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 13:14:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201304191314.16435.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <512050154.1871290.1366364116628.JavaMail.root@advansee.com>
Dear Beno?t Th?baudeau,
> On Friday, April 19, 2013 10:38:48 AM, Beno?t Th?baudeau wrote:
> > Dear Marek Vasut,
> >
> > On Friday, April 19, 2013 6:10:51 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > Add support for generic NAND SPL via the SPL framework into the
> > > mxc_nand_spl driver. This is basically just a simple rename and
> > > publication of the already implemented functions. To avoid the
> > > old function which are used with the nand_spl/ stuff getting in
> > > the way of NAND SPL framework, the macro CONFIG_SPL_NAND_LEGACY
> > > was introduced and two remaining legacy boards were adjusted.
> > > These board need to be either fixed or removed in the long run,
> > > but I don't have either.
> > >
> > > Also make sure the requested payload is aligned to full pages,
> > > otherwise this simple driver fails to load the last page.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> > > Cc: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
> > > Cc: Beno?t Th?baudeau <benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com>
> > > Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
> > > Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
> > > Cc: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
> > > Cc: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > drivers/mtd/nand/mxc_nand_spl.c | 13 ++++++++++---
> > > include/configs/mx31pdk.h | 1 +
> > > include/configs/tx25.h | 1 +
> > > 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/mxc_nand_spl.c
> > > b/drivers/mtd/nand/mxc_nand_spl.c
> > > index 09f23c3..8ff03c9 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/mxc_nand_spl.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/mxc_nand_spl.c
> > > @@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ static int is_badblock(int pagenumber)
> > >
> > > return 0;
> > >
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static int nand_load(unsigned int from, unsigned int size, unsigned
> > > char *buf)
> > > +int nand_spl_load_image(uint32_t from, unsigned int size, void *buf)
> > >
> > > {
> > >
> > > int i;
> > > unsigned int page;
> > >
> > > @@ -303,6 +303,7 @@ static int nand_load(unsigned int from, unsigned
> > > int size, unsigned char *buf)
> > >
> > > page = from / CONFIG_SYS_NAND_PAGE_SIZE;
> > > i = 0;
> > >
> > > + size = roundup(size, CONFIG_SYS_NAND_PAGE_SIZE);
> > >
> > > while (i < size / CONFIG_SYS_NAND_PAGE_SIZE) {
> > >
> > > if (nfc_read_page(page, buf) < 0)
> > >
> > > return -1;
> > >
> > > @@ -332,6 +333,7 @@ static int nand_load(unsigned int from, unsigned
> > > int size, unsigned char *buf)
> > >
> > > return 0;
> > >
> > > }
> > >
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_NAND_SUPPORT_LEGACY
> > >
> > > /*
> > >
> > > * The main entry for NAND booting. It's necessary that SDRAM is
> > > already * configured and available since this code loads the main
> > > U-Boot image
> > >
> > > @@ -345,8 +347,9 @@ void nand_boot(void)
> > >
> > > * CONFIG_SYS_NAND_U_BOOT_OFFS and CONFIG_SYS_NAND_U_BOOT_SIZE must
> > > * be aligned to full pages
> > > */
> > >
> > > - if (!nand_load(CONFIG_SYS_NAND_U_BOOT_OFFS,
> > > CONFIG_SYS_NAND_U_BOOT_SIZE, - (uchar
> > > *)CONFIG_SYS_NAND_U_BOOT_DST)) {
> > > + if (!nand_spl_load_image(CONFIG_SYS_NAND_U_BOOT_OFFS,
> > > + CONFIG_SYS_NAND_U_BOOT_SIZE,
> > > + (uchar *)CONFIG_SYS_NAND_U_BOOT_DST)) {
> > >
> > > /* Copy from NAND successful, start U-boot */
> > > uboot = (void *)CONFIG_SYS_NAND_U_BOOT_START;
> > > uboot();
> > >
> > > @@ -364,3 +367,7 @@ void hang(void)
> > >
> > > /* Loop forever */
> > > while (1) ;
> > >
> > > }
> > >
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> > > +void nand_init(void) {}
> > > +void nand_deselect(void) {}
> > > diff --git a/include/configs/mx31pdk.h b/include/configs/mx31pdk.h
> > > index 1754595..217552e 100644
> > > --- a/include/configs/mx31pdk.h
> > > +++ b/include/configs/mx31pdk.h
> > > @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@
> > >
> > > #define CONFIG_SPL_LDSCRIPT "arch/$(ARCH)/cpu/u-boot-spl.lds"
> > > #define CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE 2048
> > > #define CONFIG_SPL_NAND_SUPPORT
> > >
> > > +#define CONFIG_SPL_NAND_SUPPORT_LEGACY
> > >
> > > #define CONFIG_SPL_TEXT_BASE 0x87dc0000
> > > #define CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE 0x87e00000
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/configs/tx25.h b/include/configs/tx25.h
> > > index e72f8f6..7c362d0 100644
> > > --- a/include/configs/tx25.h
> > > +++ b/include/configs/tx25.h
> > > @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
> > >
> > > #define CONFIG_SPL_LDSCRIPT "arch/$(ARCH)/cpu/u-boot-
spl.lds"
> > > #define CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE 2048
> > > #define CONFIG_SPL_NAND_SUPPORT
> > >
> > > +#define CONFIG_SPL_NAND_SUPPORT_LEGACY
> > >
> > > #define CONFIG_SPL_TEXT_BASE 0x810c0000
> > > #define CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE 0x81200000
> > >
> > > --
> > > 1.7.11.7
> >
> > This is not about legacy vs. non-legacy. This is about basic vs. more
> > featured
> > SPL because of SPL size constraints. So what about dropping
> > CONFIG_SPL_NAND_SUPPORT_LEGACY and testing for CONFIG_SPL_FRAMEWORK
> > definition
> > instead?
I was thinking about that, but the symbol is unrelated to NAND. I still think
it's either a matter of fixing for new SPL or removing those two boards. The
nand_spl/ stuff shall be removed ASAP.
> Also, I don't see any nand_init() (called by spl_nand_load_image()) for
> m53evk.
What do you mean?
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-19 11:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-19 4:10 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/6] imx: Align the imximage header and payload to multiples of 4k Marek Vasut
2013-04-19 4:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/6] nand: Add SPL_NAND support to mxc_nand_spl Marek Vasut
2013-04-19 8:38 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-04-19 9:35 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-04-19 11:14 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2013-04-19 11:55 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-04-19 13:46 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-04-19 17:08 ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-20 13:00 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-04-19 17:06 ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-20 13:06 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-04-20 17:09 ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-19 13:00 ` Philip Paeps
2013-04-19 14:48 ` Philip Paeps
2013-04-19 14:53 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-04-19 15:09 ` Philip Paeps
2013-04-19 15:21 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-04-19 15:28 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-04-19 15:41 ` Philip Paeps
2013-04-19 16:20 ` Tom Rini
2013-04-19 17:11 ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-19 4:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/6] arm: imx: Fix u-boot-with-nand-spl.imx target Marek Vasut
2013-04-19 8:56 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-04-19 11:16 ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-19 11:42 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-04-19 11:51 ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-19 11:55 ` Tom Rini
2013-04-19 17:04 ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-19 4:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/6] arm: mx5: Add SPL support code to MX5 Marek Vasut
2013-04-19 9:03 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-04-19 13:10 ` Philip Paeps
2013-04-20 10:28 ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-21 0:38 ` Marek Vasut
2013-05-05 16:06 ` Stefano Babic
2013-04-19 4:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/6] arm: mx5: Add NAND clock handling Marek Vasut
2013-04-19 9:02 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-04-19 9:08 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-04-19 11:18 ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-19 11:32 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-05-05 16:04 ` Stefano Babic
2013-04-19 4:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 6/6] arm: mx5: Add support for DENX M53EVK Marek Vasut
2013-04-19 5:52 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-04-19 11:58 ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-19 12:58 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-04-21 0:43 ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-21 6:35 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-04-21 14:42 ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-21 22:13 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-04-21 23:09 ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-22 11:19 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-04-25 19:07 ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-19 9:22 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-04-19 11:44 ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-19 12:54 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-04-19 13:56 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-04-19 14:49 ` Fabio Estevam
2013-04-21 2:32 ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-19 8:15 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/6] imx: Align the imximage header and payload to multiples of 4k Benoît Thébaudeau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201304191314.16435.marex@denx.de \
--to=marex@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox