From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Vasut Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 13:51:04 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/6] arm: imx: Fix u-boot-with-nand-spl.imx target In-Reply-To: <1220852803.1874173.1366371724801.JavaMail.root@advansee.com> References: <1366344655-8535-1-git-send-email-marex@denx.de> <201304191316.31806.marex@denx.de> <1220852803.1874173.1366371724801.JavaMail.root@advansee.com> Message-ID: <201304191351.04346.marex@denx.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Dear Beno?t Th?baudeau, > Dear Marek Vasut, > > On Friday, April 19, 2013 1:16:31 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > Dear Beno?t Th?baudeau, > > > > > Dear Marek Vasut, > > > > > > On Friday, April 19, 2013 6:10:52 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > > > This target is currently concatenating u-boot SPL in imximage format > > > > with u-boot.bin. The NAND SPL can load a raw binary, but the > > > > preffered format with much less limitations is uImage format. Fix > > > > the target so u-boot.bin is first converted into uImage format and > > > > only after that is concatenated. > > > > > > Please reword: This is not a fix, but an enhancement. > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut > > > > Cc: Albert ARIBAUD > > > > Cc: Beno?t Th?baudeau > > > > Cc: Fabio Estevam > > > > Cc: Scott Wood > > > > Cc: Stefano Babic > > > > Cc: Tom Rini > > > > --- > > > > > > > > arch/arm/imx-common/Makefile | 7 +++++-- > > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/imx-common/Makefile > > > > b/arch/arm/imx-common/Makefile index 44b6822..ba31d3e 100644 > > > > --- a/arch/arm/imx-common/Makefile > > > > +++ b/arch/arm/imx-common/Makefile > > > > @@ -69,8 +69,11 @@ $(OBJTREE)/u-boot-with-nand-spl.imx: > > > > $(OBJTREE)/SPL $(OBJTREE)/u-boot.bin > > > > > > > > -I binary -O binary $(OBJTREE)/spl/u-boot-nand-spl.imx \ > > > > $(OBJTREE)/spl/u-boot-nand-spl-pad.imx > > > > > > > > rm $(OBJTREE)/spl/u-boot-nand-spl.imx > > > > > > > > - cat $(OBJTREE)/spl/u-boot-nand-spl-pad.imx $(OBJTREE)/u-boot.bin > > > > > $@ - rm $(OBJTREE)/spl/u-boot-nand-spl-pad.imx > > > > + $(OBJTREE)/tools/mkimage -A arm -O U-Boot -a > > > > $(CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE) \ + -e $(CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE) -C none -d > > > > $(OBJTREE)/u-boot.bin \ + $(OBJTREE)/u-boot.uim > > > > + cat $(OBJTREE)/spl/u-boot-nand-spl-pad.imx $(OBJTREE)/u-boot.uim > > > > > $@ + rm $(OBJTREE)/spl/u-boot-nand-spl-pad.imx $(OBJTREE)/u-boot.uim > > > > > > > > #################################################################### > > > > #### # > > > > > > > > -- > > > > 1.7.11.7 > > > > > > This change is correct. > > > > > > I don't know the uImage format very well. Can you give examples of what > > > this patch can bring compared to the raw binary format? > > > > > > If this change is useful, it should probably be made for > > > u-boot-with-spl.imx too. > > > > Please see common/spl/spl_nand.c which calls spl_parse_image_header() on > > the payload loaded from NAND. This is implemented in common/spl/spl.c > > and if proper > > header is not found, the payload is assumed to be of 200kB of size, which > > is far > > less than fully configured U-Boot. > > Or you could #define CONFIG_SYS_MONITOR_LEN to what you need. YUCK! > > So using the uimage format is much more > > flexible. > > I agree. > > So I'd see the following changes for this patch: > - Reword "fix" to show enhancement, and detail the flexibility rationale > in the description. > - Extend to u-boot-with-spl.imx. Ok. Tom, shall we merge this one into current release after it's fixed?