From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 10:57:16 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] arm: make __image_copy_{start,
 end} compiler-generated
In-Reply-To: <20130511221351.73ea31b2@lilith>
References: <1368223012-17609-1-git-send-email-albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
	<1368223012-17609-2-git-send-email-albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
	<1368223012-17609-3-git-send-email-albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
	<794454861.738554.1368231902880.JavaMail.root@advansee.com>
	<20130511100248.60a853ee@lilith>
	<1762536573.747249.1368294737084.JavaMail.root@advansee.com>
	<20130511221351.73ea31b2@lilith>
Message-ID: <20130512105716.0cf2ece0@lilith>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On Sat, 11 May 2013 22:13:51 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD
<albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote:

> Hence, if an SPL script sort-of-hardcodes image start and end (or
> relocation symbols as some do), then I prefer to leave it alone for now
> and handle in the linker script factoring series later.

... but I do realize in some cases I removed __image_copy_end and in
others I didn't. I'll go over this again in V2 by following the
rule of least change -- not doing a change unless required by the
objective of the series, that is, factoring relocate code.

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.