[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5] arm: ensure u-boot only uses relative relocations

[Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>]

Hi again Beno?t,

On Wed, 15 May 2013 09:46:17 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD
<albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote:

> Hi Beno?t,
> 
> On Wed, 15 May 2013 00:12:24 +0200 (CEST), Beno?t Th?baudeau
> <benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Albert,
> 
> > > --- a/Makefile
> > > +++ b/Makefile
> > > @@ -746,6 +746,13 @@ tools: $(VERSION_FILE) $(TIMESTAMP_FILE)
> > >  	$(MAKE) -C $@ all
> > >  endif	# config.mk
> > >  
> > > +# ARM relocations should all be R_ARM_RELATIVE.
> > > +checkarmreloc: $(obj)u-boot
> > > +	@if test "R_ARM_RELATIVE" != \
> > > +		"`readelf -r $(obj)u-boot | cut -d ' ' -f 4 | grep R_ARM | sort -u`"; \
> >                              ^
> >                              or $$< to avoid a duplicate?
> 
> Will fix as suggested.

> > > +		then echo "$(obj)u-boot contains relocations other than \
> >                            ^
> >                            or $$< too, or no $(obj) prefix@all for this message?
> 
> I prefer leaving the prefix so that failures during out-of-tree builds
> or during MAKEALL builds with BUILD_NBUILDS>1 log the correct path.

Actually $$< does not work within backquotes unless escaped as a less
legible \$\$<, and does not work properly@all within double quotes,
whether escaped or not.

Do you prefer that I change only the first $(obj)u-boot into \$\$< and
leave the second one untouched, or that I leave both $(obj)u-boot
instances as-is for the sake of homogeneity?

> > Best regards,
> > Beno?t

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.