[U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: arm720t: Add missing CONFIG_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT guard for cpu_init_crit

[Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>]

Hi Marek,

On Wed, 15 May 2013 05:36:14 +0200, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:

> Dear Axel Lin,
> 
> > cpu_init_crit() can be skipped, but the code is still enabled requiring a
> > platform to supply lowlevel_init().
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
> 
> Nice CC list, it'd be the best if you CCed the ARM maintainer too though ;-)

Thanks Marek. :)

> > ---
> >  arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/start.S | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/start.S b/arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/start.S
> > index 9facc7e..9f0e3f9 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/start.S
> > +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/start.S
> > @@ -244,6 +244,7 @@ c_runtime_cpu_setup:
> >   *************************************************************************
> >   */
> > 
> > +#ifndef CONFIG_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT
> >  cpu_init_crit:
> > 
> >  #if !defined(CONFIG_TEGRA)
> > @@ -258,6 +259,7 @@ cpu_init_crit:
> >  #endif
> > 
> >  	mov	pc, lr
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT */
> > 
> > 
> >  #ifndef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD

I am tempted to ask: what actual issue does this guarding aim at
solving? Just in case, beware that AFAIR Wolfgang does not consider
'because debugging' a valid answer.

> Best regards,
> Marek Vasut

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.