[U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: arm720t: Add missing CONFIG_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT guard for cpu_init_crit

[Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>]

Hi Tom,

On Fri, 17 May 2013 15:11:26 -0700, Tom Warren <TWarren@nvidia.com>
wrote:

> Axel (& Albert)
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Stephen Warren [mailto:swarren at wwwdotorg.org]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 9:29 PM
> > To: Axel Lin
> > Cc: Wolfgang Denk; Heiko Schocher; Tom Warren; u-boot at lists.denx.de
> > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: arm720t: Add missing
> > CONFIG_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT guard for cpu_init_crit
> > 
> > On 05/15/2013 07:00 PM, Axel Lin wrote:
> > > 2013/5/15 Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>:
> > >> On 05/14/2013 09:04 PM, Axel Lin wrote:
> > >>> cpu_init_crit() can be skipped, but the code is still enabled
> > >>> requiring a platform to supply lowlevel_init().
> > >>
> > >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/start.S
> > >>> b/arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/start.S
> > >>
> > >>> +#ifndef CONFIG_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT
> > >>>  cpu_init_crit:
> > >>>
> > >>>  #if !defined(CONFIG_TEGRA)
> > >>> @@ -258,6 +259,7 @@ cpu_init_crit:
> > >>>  #endif
> > >>>
> > >>>       mov     pc, lr
> > >>> +#endif /* CONFIG_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT */
> > >>
> > >> If you're going to make changes here, you should probably ensure that
> > >> Tegra is setting CONFIG_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT, and then remove the
> > >> Tegra-specific ifdef from the body of that function. That's assuming
> > >> that setting CONFIG_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT doesn't have any other side-
> > effects.
> > >
> > > Tegra exists in both arm720t and armv7:
> > >
> > > ./arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/tegra-common
> > > ./arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/tegra30
> > > ./arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/tegra20
> > > ./arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/tegra114
> > >
> > > ./arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra-common
> > > ./arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra30
> > > ./arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra20
> > > ./arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra114
> > >
> > > I'm wondering if we set CONFIG_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT for tegra will also
> > > impact the code path in arch/arm/cpu/armv7/start.S ?
> > 
> > Yes, you certainly only want to set CONFIG_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT for the SPL
> > build. There's a whole section of include/configs/tegra-common-post.h
> > which is ifdef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD, so it might make sense to #define
> > CONFIG_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT there.
> I've applied your two patches (this one and the RFT for Tegra) to u-boot-tegra/next and I'm running a MAKEALL right now, then I'll do a test on Cardhu and Dalmore.
> 
> Both of these are assigned to me in PatchWork - Albert - do you want me to take them both in via the Tegra tree, or do you want to take the ARM patch and I'll take the Tegra patch? Let me know.

Please take both in Tegra tree.

> Axel - I'll let you know how testing goes, and then you can resubmit the RFT patch as a real patch against Tegra.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Tom
> --
> nvpublic

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.