From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 11:05:45 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/6] Optimize ARM relocation
In-Reply-To: <20130611144729.5bbf542b@lilith>
References: <1369724512-4047-1-git-send-email-albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
	<1370953055-13482-1-git-send-email-albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
	<20130611144729.5bbf542b@lilith>
Message-ID: <20130613110545.5e3c1708@lilith>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hi Albert,

On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 14:47:29 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD
<albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote:

> Hi Albert,
> 
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 14:17:29 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD
> <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote:
> 
> > This series optimizes relocation by ensuring ARM
> > binaries only use one type of relocation record,
> > R_ARM_RELATIVE., then optimizing relocation code
> > accordingly.
> 
> This is a cosmetic version only; if no one complains loudly, this
> will be the final version too.
> 
> So people, as this touches ARM relocation, I would appreciate it if a
> few people could test it on their own ARM HW target and see if they
> still get a prompt, if command completion still works, etc.

Lubo has tested on a custom ARM board, my thanks to him.

Anyone else would be so kind as to do a quick test on their ARM boards?

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.