From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Vasut Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 15:57:48 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] gpio: spear_gpio: Fix gpio_set_value() implementation In-Reply-To: References: <1371712419.4200.1.camel@phoenix> Message-ID: <201306201557.48717.marex@denx.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Dear Michael Trimarchi, > Hi > > Il giorno 20/giu/2013 09:14, "Axel Lin" ha scritto: > > In current gpio_set_value() implementation, it always sets the gpio > > control bit > > > no matter the value argument is 0 or 1. Thus the GPIOs never set to low. > > This patch fixes this bug. > > > > Signed-off-by: Axel Lin > > --- > > > > drivers/gpio/spear_gpio.c | 5 ++++- > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/spear_gpio.c b/drivers/gpio/spear_gpio.c > > index d3c728e..8878608 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpio/spear_gpio.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/spear_gpio.c > > @@ -52,7 +52,10 @@ int gpio_set_value(unsigned gpio, int value) > > > > { > > > > struct gpio_regs *regs = (struct gpio_regs *)CONFIG_GPIO_BASE; > > > > - writel(1 << gpio, ®s->gpiodata[DATA_REG_ADDR(gpio)]); > > + if (value) > > + writel(1 << gpio, ®s->gpiodata[DATA_REG_ADDR(gpio)]); > > + else > > + writel(0, ®s->gpiodata[DATA_REG_ADDR(gpio)]); > > > > return 0; > > > > } > > Does it work the clear? Seems that it sets to 0 all the bank. I'm using the > mobile I don't think I speak language of your tribe (lol) ;-) What's "the mobile" please ? Best regards, Marek Vasut