From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Rini Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 12:07:18 -0400 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 12/12] Add verified boot information and test In-Reply-To: References: <1371161411-2834-1-git-send-email-sjg@chromium.org> <1371161411-2834-13-git-send-email-sjg@chromium.org> Message-ID: <20130620160718.GF16983@bill-the-cat> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 03:33:19PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Simon Glass wrote: > > > Add a description of how to implement verified boot using signed FIT > > images, > > and a simple test which verifies operation on sandbox. > > > > The test signs a FIT image and verifies it, then signs a FIT configuration > > and verifies it. Then it corrupts the signature to check that this is > > detected. > > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass > > > > If it helps, here are the results of my build for this series (and the > trace one). No new failures but you can see quite a few problems with > Xscale. I _think_ Xscale is toolchain choice related. My question is, for arches which use --gc-sections, what is the size change from before to after, when not opting in on this? -- Tom -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: