From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Rini Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 16:30:54 -0400 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: omap5_uevm: Correct the console sys prompt for 5432 In-Reply-To: <20130622113311.1d1b1746@lilith> References: <1370554238-14670-1-git-send-email-dmurphy@ti.com> <20130611155342.GW26693@bill-the-cat> <20130622113311.1d1b1746@lilith> Message-ID: <20130624203054.GA28078@bill-the-cat> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 11:33:11AM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 11:53:42 -0400, Tom Rini wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 04:30:38PM -0500, Dan Murphy wrote: > > > > > Correct the console sys prompt to display the correct processor > > > and the corrent board > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy > > > Reported-by: Lubomir Popov > > > > Reviewed-by: Tom Rini > > > > But personally, this is why I'm a fan of 'U-Boot # ' as the prompt :) > > I'd like it too if we could simply have all boards using the same > prompt, but there might be some scripts out there which rely on the > prompt being something else than "U-Boot # ' or worse yet, using the > prompt to determine which variant of the HW the scripts are dealing > with. True. Looking ahead however, given device trees and the need to know what tree to request/load, I hope more boards will go with enabling CONFIG_ENV_VARS_UBOOT_CONFIG and can then use cpu/board/board_name as needed to determine those things at run-time. -- Tom -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: