public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: omap5_uevm: Correct the console sys prompt for 5432
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 09:00:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130627090059.1b01e0f6@lilith> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130624203054.GA28078@bill-the-cat>

Hi Tom,

On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 16:30:54 -0400, Tom Rini <trini@ti.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 11:33:11AM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> > 
> > On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 11:53:42 -0400, Tom Rini <trini@ti.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 04:30:38PM -0500, Dan Murphy wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Correct the console sys prompt to display the correct processor
> > > > and the corrent board
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com>
> > > > Reported-by: Lubomir Popov <lpopov@mm-sol.com>
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
> > > 
> > > But personally, this is why I'm a fan of 'U-Boot # ' as the prompt :)
> > 
> > I'd like it too if we could simply have all boards using the same
> > prompt, but there might be some scripts out there which rely on the
> > prompt being something else than "U-Boot # ' or worse yet, using the
> > prompt to determine which variant of the HW the scripts are dealing
> > with.
> 
> True.  Looking ahead however, given device trees and the need to know
> what tree to request/load, I hope more boards will go with enabling
> CONFIG_ENV_VARS_UBOOT_CONFIG and can then use cpu/board/board_name as
> needed to determine those things at run-time.

How about announcing (as in, "letting the whole world know by slipping
it in our public announcement of 2013.07") that custom prompts will be
deprecated starting with 2013.10 and that targets still having them by
2014.01 will be retired?

That's what we did for ARM ELF relocation IIRC.

Of course, that would require a few round of e-mails to maintainers, at
least to those whose targets' config header files still have custom
prompts when reaching 2014.01-rc1; and there will be some yelling that
such or such board has been dropped from U-Boot and why were users not
told, etc.

Alternatively, we could announce and deprecate in 2013.10 and remove
all custom prompts in 2013.14 ourselves, then wait for annoyed people
to yell at us, and advise them to enable CONFIG_ENV_VARS_UBOOT_CONFIG
and uptate their scripts. Less prep work, slightly more yelling.

We could even shift the schedule, deprecate for 2013.07 and remove in
2013.10. Same amount of work, yelling goes away earlier.

My vote goes to this last proposal. :)

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-27  7:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-06 21:30 [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: omap5_uevm: Correct the console sys prompt for 5432 Dan Murphy
2013-06-11 15:53 ` Tom Rini
2013-06-22  9:33   ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-06-24 20:30     ` Tom Rini
2013-06-27  7:00       ` Albert ARIBAUD [this message]
2013-07-15 16:36         ` Tom Rini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130627090059.1b01e0f6@lilith \
    --to=albert.u.boot@aribaud.net \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox