From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Albert ARIBAUD Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 10:57:40 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCHv2] socfpga: Move board/socfpga_cyclone5 to board/socfpga In-Reply-To: <20130708232201.GA17631@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> References: <1372802418-9010-1-git-send-email-dinguyen@altera.com> <20130705230459.00fc4b44@lilith> <1373299837.22533.1.camel@linux-builds1> <20130708220142.1f4d765f@lilith> <20130708232201.GA17631@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> Message-ID: <20130709105740.22ecd96c@lilith> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi Pavel, On Tue, 9 Jul 2013 01:22:01 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > > > From: Dinh Nguyen > > > > > > > > > > Because the SOCFPGA platform will include support for Cyclone V and > > > > > Arria V FPGA parts, renaming socfpga_cyclone5 folder to socfpga to > > > > > be more generic. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Dinh Nguyen > > > > > Reviewed-by: Pavel Machek > > > > > Cc: Chin Liang See > > > > > Cc: Wolfgang Denk > > > > > CC: Pavel Machek > > > > > Cc: Tom Rini > > > > > > > > > > v2: > > > > > - Add Reviewed-by: Pavel Machek > > > > > - Cc: Tom Rini > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > Do you really mean that V2 is the exact same code as V1? If it is, then > > > > V2 is unneeded. And if V2 is different from V1, then history should > > > > tells us the difference(s). > > > > > > V2 is the same as v1 codewise. So should I resend this a V1 to be > > > applied? > > > > If V1 is the same as V2 as far as the code is concerned, then there is > > simply no point in sending V2 or resending V1 again. > > > > The V2 history makes me guess you thought it necessary to officialize > > Pavel's Reviewed-By somehow, but that's unneeded; patchworks takes care > > of collecting all the {Reviewed,Acked,Tested,...}-by's and providing > > them when applying the patch through pwclient. > > This got pretty confusing lately. Can we just wait for the patches to > be applied, or do we need to take some action? No, no need to take action; I was just clarifying why V2 was unneeded here, so that similar uneeded new versions are avoided in the future. Since V1 has already been marked as superseded, I'll apply V2 -- after 2013.07 is out. > Thanks, > Pavel Amicalement, -- Albert.