From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 18:14:11 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 7/7] am335x_evm: Add support to boot from
 NOR.
In-Reply-To: <20130711180859.429a6c14@lilith>
References: <1368469719-22406-1-git-send-email-trini@ti.com>
	<1368469719-22406-7-git-send-email-trini@ti.com>
	<51BF2089.90605@newflow.co.uk> <51C04E62.4070206@newflow.co.uk>
	<51DEADD2.3050805@newflow.co.uk>
	<20130711132816.GB13531@bill-the-cat>
	<51DEB6E4.50403@newflow.co.uk> <20130711163418.6caf4fb3@lilith>
	<20130711155409.GH13531@bill-the-cat>
	<20130711180859.429a6c14@lilith>
Message-ID: <20130711181411.43fe7202@lilith>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 18:08:59 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD
<albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote:

> Hi Tom,
> 
> On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:54:09 -0400, Tom Rini <trini@ti.com> wrote:
> 
> > The new in the patch
> > board/ti/am335x/u-boot.lds needed to be re-synced with
> > arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds again.
> 
> Actually, I wonder why so many ARM .lds files need to exist at all,
> when arch/arm/cpu/u-boot[-spl].lds could be used most of the time. I
> suspect that the main reason for custom .lds files is ad hoc MEMORY
> declarations, which could easily be commonalized through adequate
> preprocessing.

... well here the only difference with arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds is the
addition of board/ti/am335x/libam335x.o right after start.o but this
should probably also be manageable in arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds.

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.