[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/5] omap3_beagle: remove JFFS2 support.

[Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>]

On 23:25-20130711, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> wrote:
> > On 21:49-20130711, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> wrote:
> >> > We do not use JFFS2 by default and it conflicts with
> >> > CONFIG_CMD_FS_GENERIC (ls command is the same). Since most of our
> >> > BOOTCMD can be simplified by using the FS_GENERIC, dropping JFFS2
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
> >> > ---
> >> >  include/configs/omap3_beagle.h |    8 --------
> >> >  1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/include/configs/omap3_beagle.h b/include/configs/omap3_beagle.h
> >> > index 48ce4c0..9adf4a5 100644
> >> > --- a/include/configs/omap3_beagle.h
> >> > +++ b/include/configs/omap3_beagle.h
> >> > @@ -150,7 +150,6 @@
> >> >  #define CONFIG_CMD_CACHE
> >> >  #define CONFIG_CMD_EXT2                /* EXT2 Support                 */
> >> >  #define CONFIG_CMD_FAT         /* FAT support                  */
> >> > -#define CONFIG_CMD_JFFS2       /* JFFS2 Support                */
> >> >  #define CONFIG_CMD_MTDPARTS    /* Enable MTD parts commands */
> >> >  #define CONFIG_MTD_DEVICE      /* needed for mtdparts commands */
> >> >  #define MTDIDS_DEFAULT                 "nand0=nand"
> >> > @@ -203,13 +202,6 @@
> >> >
> >> >  #define CONFIG_SYS_MAX_NAND_DEVICE     1               /* Max number of NAND */
> >> >                                                         /* devices */
> >> > -#define CONFIG_JFFS2_NAND
> >> > -/* nand device jffs2 lives on */
> >> > -#define CONFIG_JFFS2_DEV               "nand0"
> >> > -/* start of jffs2 partition */
> >> > -#define CONFIG_JFFS2_PART_OFFSET       0x680000
> >> > -#define CONFIG_JFFS2_PART_SIZE         0xf980000       /* size of jffs2 */
> >> >
> >>
> >> Minor nit, can we perhaps leave the JFFS configuration and only remove/comment
> >> CONFIG_CMD_JFFS. That way we wont lose these paritition offsets/size for folks
> >> who might need them.
> > then we have to drop the usage of FS_GENERIC. code wont build with both.
> 
> No I meant drop CMD_JFFS but not the other JFFS.

Those wont come into play unless CMD_JFFS2 is enabled, and as stated,
makes no sense to keep the second part around and trick some poor bloke
into thinking CMD_JFFS2 was left out by mistake..

> 
> > There is no point in keeping something as an option if it cant be used.
> > dont you agree?
> 
> Either way is OK with me, you have a point too.
OK, will take this to mean that you are ok with the patch as is. Thanks
for the review.

-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon