From: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] common/cmd_nand.c license terms
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 22:08:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130729200823.1480738047B@gemini.denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1375127231.30721.54@snotra>
Dear Scott,
In message <1375127231.30721.54@snotra> you wrote:
>
> > Looking at this commit, it is totally unclear to me which parts of the
> > newly added code you could be referring to with your "which are not
> > considered a derived work of GPL v2-only code".
> >
> > Your addition makes the legal situation of the whole file pretty much
> > indeterminable. Could you please be so kind and explain what exactly
> > your intention was, and what exactly yuou were referring to?
>
> The license of the whole file is GPLv2 only. The intent was to
Is it? Why so? It appears that the first versions of that file did
not include any license header at all, which means they were
contributed under the project-wide GPLv2+ license.
Only your commit added - 7 years later! - a GPLv2 only license header,
and I really wonder what the base for this change would be?
> preemptively grant relicensing permission for GPLv2 or later, if a
> similar agreement could be reached from other copyright holders, or if
> the file eventually changes to the point where none of the original
> v2-only code remains, and if what is left isn't considered derivative
Which "original v2-only code" are you referring to?
> As for which parts are considered a derivative, I am not a lawyer and
> can't answer that. It's not a licensing question, but rather a basic
> copyright question. The point is that it wouldn't be Freescale raising
> a copyright complaint[1] if you were to license it as v2 or later.
>
> It was a response to your asking for no more v2-only code in U-Boot.
> We can remove the above text (except the actual copyright line) and
> make it clearly v2-only if you'd prefer.
I fail to see where your "v2-only" notion is coming from.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
I had the rare misfortune of being one of the first people to try and
implement a PL/1 compiler. -- T. Cheatham
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-29 20:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-28 12:31 [U-Boot] common/cmd_nand.c license terms Wolfgang Denk
2013-07-29 19:47 ` Scott Wood
2013-07-29 20:08 ` Wolfgang Denk [this message]
2013-07-29 21:21 ` Scott Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130729200823.1480738047B@gemini.denx.de \
--to=wd@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox