From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Vasut Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2013 00:10:41 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 01/20] Add functions for use with i.mx6 otg udc In-Reply-To: <51FC0C2D.3070008@boundarydevices.com> References: <1375399657-25642-1-git-send-email-troy.kisky@boundarydevices.com> <201308021248.52104.marex@denx.de> <51FC0C2D.3070008@boundarydevices.com> Message-ID: <201308030010.41510.marex@denx.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Dear Troy Kisky, > On 8/2/2013 3:48 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > Dear Troy Kisky, > > > >> Add functions for use with mx6 soc > >> void otg_enable(void); > >> void reset_usb_phy1(void); > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky > >> --- > >> > >> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/soc.c | 47 > >> > >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/crm_regs.h > >> > >> | 3 ++ > >> > >> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/imx-regs.h | 17 +++++++++++ > >> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/sys_proto.h | 4 +++ > >> 4 files changed, 71 insertions(+) > > > > [...] > > > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/imx-regs.h > >> b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/imx-regs.h index 5d6bccb..3eed4d8 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/imx-regs.h > >> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/imx-regs.h > >> @@ -419,6 +419,23 @@ struct cspi_regs { > >> > >> ECSPI5_BASE_ADDR > >> > >> #endif > >> > >> +struct set_clr_tog { > >> + u32 val; > >> + u32 set; > >> + u32 clr; > >> + u32 tog; > >> +}; > >> + > >> +struct usbphy { > >> + struct set_clr_tog pwd; > >> + struct set_clr_tog tx; > >> + struct set_clr_tog rx; > >> + struct set_clr_tog ctrl; > >> +}; > > > > Maybe you want to keep the naming here consistent with MX28 and MX6? > > > > See arch/arm/include/asm/imx-common/regs-common.h > > > > [...] > > > > Best regards, > > Marek Vasut > > Wow, arch/arm/include/asm/imx-common/regs-common.h > is damn ugly. I personally hate unions even when there is a very good > reason. > > Would you like to see me attempt to clean it up or do you like it the > way it is > since your commit started the unions ? I think it works perfectly well and does exactly what it's supposed to do. What's your problem with the file? Best regards, Marek Vasut