From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 19:59:46 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] omap1510inn/arm925t: maintain or remove?
In-Reply-To: <20130810130258.CEEC8380E09@gemini.denx.de>
References: <20130810084118.2d6c9804@lilith>
	<20130810130258.CEEC8380E09@gemini.denx.de>
Message-ID: <201308111959.46281.marex@denx.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Dear Wolfgang Denk,

> Dear Albert,
> 
> In message <20130810084118.2d6c9804@lilith> you wrote:
> > Board omap1510inn is marked orphaned.
> 
> ...
> 
> > Should I try and clean this within my start.S commonalization effort
> > (first submission tonight, BTW) and move the signature generation
> > in ./Makefile as a new image rule, or should I simply remove omap1510inn
> > as well as the whole arm295t support?
> > 
> > My own vote goes for removing; anyone wishing to resurrect the board
> > can do it from some commit before removal.
> 
> My vote goes for removal, too.  This is stuff which has long reached
> EOL.

I have one OMAP1510 board running U-Boot 1.1.3 (Palm Tungsten|T), but I dont 
think I will ever touch it again, so my vote goes for removal too.

Best regards,
Marek Vasut